BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
eagles_dare13
Obsidian | Level 7

If I have a SAS transformation Step like Join/Extract and I use the Mappings tab to map Source and Target tables, and  I go to 'Code' tab
, I can see generated code.

When I switch to 'User Written Body' from 'Automatic' I can put in my own code that overrides those mappings. The default mappings are greyed out.

I know that when I run it, the code written by me will be executed over the one greyed out in 'User Written Body'.

The thing is, I was expecting the greyed out code to be commented, I just want to confirm that the greyed out code will be ignored.

3 REPLIES 3
M_Maldonado
Barite | Level 11

Try to post your question in the Data Management forum. You might have better chances there.

Good luck!

LinusH
Tourmaline | Level 20

1. Make use of User Written Body is not best practice. I even wonder they put in that functionality at all...

2. You can make sure by executing your code...?

Data never sleeps
Quentin
Super User

My understanding is when you use user-written code in DIS, DIS shows the code it generated with a grey background, and the code you write has a white background.

The DIS-generated code with a grey background IS executed.  As you say, it is not commented out.

The grey background is just there to help you distinguish which code DIS generated, and which you wrote.

BASUG is hosting free webinars Next up: Mark Keintz presenting History Carried Forward, Future Carried Back: Mixing Time Series of Differing Frequencies on May 8. Register now at the Boston Area SAS Users Group event page: https://www.basug.org/events.

sas-innovate-2024.png

Available on demand!

Missed SAS Innovate Las Vegas? Watch all the action for free! View the keynotes, general sessions and 22 breakouts on demand.

 

Register now!

How to choose a machine learning algorithm

Use this tutorial as a handy guide to weigh the pros and cons of these commonly used machine learning algorithms.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 3 replies
  • 841 views
  • 0 likes
  • 4 in conversation