This is the third part of a series that discusses financial fraud.
A well-defined fraud risk management policy demonstrates an organization’s commitment to transparency and accountability. It sets clear expectations for executives and employees, outlines reporting mechanisms, and ensures whistleblower protections. Beyond compliance, it builds trust with stakeholders and strengthens organizational resilience.
Core Components of an Effective Policy
- Purpose and Policy Statement
Communicate the organization’s intent to uphold integrity and ethical standards.
- Scope and Governance
Define the types of fraud covered and establish oversight structures, including roles and responsibilities for senior management and operational teams.
- Risk Assessment
Regularly evaluate fraud risks, considering factors like likelihood, financial impact, and detectability.
- Prevention and Detection
Implement strong internal controls, monitoring systems, and detection tools to identify suspicious activities early.
- Investigation and Response
Outline clear procedures for investigating suspected fraud, escalation protocols, and corrective actions.
- Reporting and Transparency
Ensure timely reporting of fraud incidents, root cause analysis, and distribution of fraud KPIs across the organization.
Governance: The Backbone of Fraud Management
Effective governance ensures consistency, transparency, and compliance with regulatory requirements. It involves:
- Regular updates to senior leadership on fraud risks and incidents.
- Continuous monitoring of high-risk processes like customer authentication and digital channels.
- Feedback loops to adapt controls to emerging threats.
Prioritizing Fraud Risks
Organizations should allocate resources based on:
- Likelihood and frequency of fraud occurrences.
- Severity of potential losses.
- Regulatory mandates and reputational impact.
- Detectability and cost-benefit analysis of detection mechanisms.
Testing Controls for Resilience
Control testing, such as “mystery shopper” exercises, helps validate effectiveness. For example, simulating fraudulent invoice submissions can reveal gaps in approval processes and detection systems. These tests often lead to enhancements like multi-layer approvals, third-party validations, and advanced analytics integration.
Continuous Improvement
Fraud risk management is not a one-time effort. It requires ongoing training, annual policy reviews, and adaptation to new fraud trends. By prioritizing governance, transparency, and proactive testing, organizations can stay ahead of fraud risks and safeguard their operations.
To learn more about combating fraud with SAS Fraud Detection, see https://www.sas.com/en_us/software/fraud-decisioning.html
Find more articles from SAS Global Enablement and Learning here.
