Combine two proc report that use the same categorization format

[Franck1048]

I'm producing these two tables with proc report:

Using this code :

proc report data=d_result.f_medo_tbc;

	title 	"Soldes courants - &DemogAnneeCourante";
	column	tx_couv_cour_arrond 
		Solde1_1GRegie_Cour,(n pctn)
		Solde1_1GRegie_Cour=cour_sum
		;

	define tx_couv_cour_arrond / group format=taux_de_couverture.;
	define pctn / FORMAT=NLPCTN8.1;
	define cour_sum / analysis sum f=6.0;


run;

proc report data=d_result.f_medo_tbc;

	title 	"Soldes courants - &DemogAnneeProjetee";
	column	tx_couv_proj_arrond
		Solde1_2GRegie_2021,(n pctn)
		Solde1_2GRegie_2021=proj_sum
		;

	define tx_couv_proj_arrond / group format=taux_de_couverture.;
	define pctn / FORMAT=NLPCTN8.1;
	define proj_sum / analysis sum f=6.0;

run;

I want to get this result (doctored image) :

As you can see, the format used for grouping is the same (taux_de_couverture.), but the variables differ.

I tried combining the two procs into a single one...

proc report data=d_result.f_medo_tbc;

	title 	"Soldes courants - &DemogAnneeCourante";
	column	tx_couv_cour_arrond 
			Solde1_1GRegie_Cour,(n pctn)
			Solde1_1GRegie_Cour=cour_sum

			tx_couv_proj_arrond
			Solde1_2GRegie_2021,(n pctn)
			Solde1_2GRegie_2021=proj_sum
			;

	define tx_couv_cour_arrond / group format=taux_de_couverture.;
	define pctn / FORMAT=NLPCTN8.1;
	define cour_sum / analysis sum f=6.0;

	define tx_couv_proj_arrond / group format=taux_de_couverture.;
	define pctn / FORMAT=NLPCTN8.1;
	define proj_sum / analysis sum f=6.0;


run;

..but as expected the grouping simply gets divided into further groups :

I tried a solution using proc tabulate but I'm also stuck with two procs.

Any ideas? Thank you!

[pink_poodle]

When you consolidate the tables like this, you are adding an across variable, that has two values: "Solde...2021" and "Solde...Cour." This variable should appear in the code:

define newvar/ across;

To add this variable, you would need to flag your data with either "Solde...2021" or "Sold...Cour", since this variable is basically a flag.

The following SAS example has a table similar to yours, the part about formats is less relevant:

http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/proc/65145/HTML/default/viewer.htm#p0be7xxo5rliwfn1ie99h...

[Franck1048]

I'm not sure this is what I'm trying to do. It looks like it, but after reading it's not the same.

Across splits a single variable into columns.

For my needs, it's my grouping variables that are different. 

tx_couv_cour_arrond and tx_couv_proj_arrond are two different variables that I make groups with using a common format.

So one observation could be in group 01 for tx_couv_cour_arrond and in group 04 for tx_couv_proj_arrond.

[pink_poodle]

I see the variables that have names starting with 'tx.' I agree with you, but I am writing about the other two variables that are your group labels, starting with 'Solde1.' These group labels can definitely be in a variable Group having flag values 1 ('Solde1_1GRegie_Cour') or 2 ('Solde1_2GRegie_2021'). Then you can make that Group variable an across variable, producing the table that you show.

[Franck1048]

Ok I understand. Then yes across is definitely part of the solution.

I've still yet to figure out if it's possible to output a single table using two different vars with the same format for grouping.

[pink_poodle]

 Where is the variable tx_couv_proj_arrond on the doctored image?