Who comes up with such crazy table names? We're a VERY large insurance company, and not one table in our production database has a name in excess of 32 characters. Simply because no earnest developer wants to waste time typing (and fixing the typos of) such elaborate constructs.
If people want to write high literature, they should not go into computing.
Since, in your case, the horse is already out of the barn, you can only define views within the database that fit into SAS specifications lengthwise. Given those idiotic table names, I suspect that you will also have to deal with idiotic column names.
Yes, that's a known challenge. SAS table names can currently only be 32 characters max.
You can always use explicit pass-through SQL to work with longer DB table names but if you just want them to become accessible in SAS then you need to create views which comply with the SAS naming standards.
Who comes up with such crazy table names? We're a VERY large insurance company, and not one table in our production database has a name in excess of 32 characters. Simply because no earnest developer wants to waste time typing (and fixing the typos of) such elaborate constructs.
If people want to write high literature, they should not go into computing.
Since, in your case, the horse is already out of the barn, you can only define views within the database that fit into SAS specifications lengthwise. Given those idiotic table names, I suspect that you will also have to deal with idiotic column names.
Registration is now open for SAS Innovate 2025 , our biggest and most exciting global event of the year! Join us in Orlando, FL, May 6-9. Sign up by Dec. 31 to get the 2024 rate of just $495. Register now!