Hello -
If I understand your question correctly you are mostly wondering about the effect of "lead 10", correct?
proc expand data=random out=want; id date; convert x = x_movSumWRONG /transformout = (lead 10 reverse movesum 10 reverse); /*suggest via Tom*/ run;
Your data (random) looks like this - leaving out some data in the middle:
date
x
1-Jan-16
114.68
2-Jan-16
83.68
3-Jan-16
111.5
4-Jan-16
86.82
5-Jan-16
103.46
6-Jan-16
92.85
7-Jan-16
88.22
8-Jan-16
98.48
9-Jan-16
99.5
10-Jan-16
132.27
11-Jan-16
87.05
12-Jan-16
99.98
13-Jan-16
75.69
…
…
20-Dec-16
93.67
21-Dec-16
114.5
22-Dec-16
94.1
23-Dec-16
96.01
24-Dec-16
104.5
25-Dec-16
104.69
26-Dec-16
116.58
27-Dec-16
98.41
28-Dec-16
103.41
29-Dec-16
110.42
30-Dec-16
90.44
31-Dec-16
88.62
Lead 10 will tell EXPAND to forget about the first 10 observations (obs) - so your time series now starts at 87.05 - you will introduce missing values are the end of your series (unless you would add SETMISS 0, which would append 0s instead).
Reverse will tell EXPAND to reverse the order, the missing values you introduced will be your new first obs, 87.05 your new last obs.
Movesum 10 will create the backward moving sum of 10 obs.
Finally Reserve will put the series into its original order again.
If you decompose your "wrong" statement into:
proc expand data=random out=want; id date; convert x = x_lead10 /transformout = (lead 10); convert x = x_reverse /transformout = (lead 10 reverse); convert x = x_movsum10 /transformout = (lead 10 reverse movsum 10); convert x = x_reverseII /transformout = (lead 10 reverse movsum 10 reverse); run;
you will see these columns in WANT.
In my mind this is the expected behaviour - it is just not the same what you'd like to archive with:
convert x= x_movSum /transformout = (movsum 10 trimleft 9);
Hope this makes sense,
Udo
... View more
