Hi Community experts,    SAS has a good Social Network Analysis and optimization engine  and Social Network Analysis on SAS Visual Investigator as well. However, some custom semantic queries and pattern matches are hard tasks to be develop directly by business users.   Neo4j had the some barrier with cypher but now they are now integrating a Natural language interface using generative AI using OpenAI ChatGPT. https://neo4j.com/labs/neodash/2.4/user-guide/extensions/natural-language-queries/   Other vendors are also working other similar use-cases like text-to-SQL Databricks https://www.databricks.com/product/databricksiq and IBM WatsonX in Analytics Fields: I https://www.ibm.com/br-pt/products/watsonx-bi-assistant.   I have some customers interested in those features and facing Neo4J competition in our customers. I am working on a project developing this integration with SAS Viya 4, but it will be incredible if we could generate a syntax to semantic queries and pattern match in Network Analysis as a feature by design of SAS SVI or SAS network Analysis make easier to end users to get information for your graphs structures. Looks a very interesting use case of generative AI.   ... View more

SAS Fraud Management 6.1 stores ACTION_TIMESTAMP in UTC. Web Application displays time by adding to ACTION_TIMESTAMP offset based on timezone set on host of WebApp Server. It causes that actions performed during winter and summer time have the same offset, but it should be different. Polish deployment example:   Actions 4116021 and 4116019 were performed at 10:29:35 local time (UTC+2h), but web application displays 9:29:35 as host' time is CET (UTC+1h) now. All countries that use DST have this problem. ... View more

The SAS Visual Investigate (Manage Investigate and Search) tool provides several features so that the client can create web/mobile pages and make them available through SAS Investigate and Search Data. With it, it is possible to model the "database", create a homepage and pages for inserting/editing/deleting data from the model, enabling several usage controls, and even adding Workflows to ensure better control of business rules linked to the pages.   The tool generally meets its purpose, however, it fails when we think about developing models and pages in parallel, where one or more teams want to parallelize development to speed up product delivery.   Currently, I cannot separate my development from my colleague's development, so our efforts end up affecting each other. For example, if he needs to change the same workflow as another colleague, this activity cannot be performed, because each one will be overwriting the other's workflow.   My proposal is to develop a functionality similar to Git, allowing that before any modification in SAS Manage Investigate and Search, it is necessary to create a "branch" for development.   I also recommend the concept of Git Flow, separating what is the main "branch", a "branch" to gather the development features and the possibility of creating as many "branches" as desired so as not to affect the development of the colleague. With the addition of this functionality, we could also create specific access to SAS Investigate and Search Data, informing which "branch" we want to render, in case we need to test our solution before publishing it on the main page.   In addition, all Merge and PR control to update the development "branch" or the main "branch" needs to be developed, and it is even possible to delegate this responsibility to specific user groups, that is, separate what only Developers can do in the tool from what Approvers can do.   This is an idea, the requirements would still need to mature a lot, however, it is currently a very urgent demand at the client where I am using SAS Visual Investigator, I would appreciate it if we had something along these lines to use. ... View more

Investigators using Procurement Integrity Visual Investigator Solutions (CMPI) on Viya4 need the ability to manage, assign, and route alerts at the scenario-fired event or incident level, not just at the entity level (e.g., vendor or employee).   Currently, Visual Investigator treats alerts as entities, meaning investigators must handle all scenario-fired events/incidents linked to an entity before closing an alert.   Disposition: Management has difficulty tracking progress because investigators need to address all events linked to an entity before an alert can be closed. Although investigators can manage a subset of events, they cannot disposition of individual scenario-fired events/incidents directly, only assess them.   Assign/Route: Investigators might need to review all incidents related to a specific scenario, such as multiple vendors sharing the same VAT number. Typically, investigator groups need to focus on specific scenarios, but the system currently routes all events associated with an alert together, making it hard to focus on individual scenarios.   Rollup: Incidents cannot be categorised under multiple alert types or strategies, which complicates the disposition and assignment processes.   Bulk Disposition: Users would need to export alerts to Excel, update disposition reasons and productivity ratings, and then upload the results back to Visual Investigator. This process is often faster than using the Visual Investigator interface directly, especially for repetitive tasks. For instance, an auditor reviewing instances where a vendor and an employee share a phone number would find it more efficient to use Excel than navigating through each alert individually.   ROI: Calculating ROI is challenging due to the lengthy implementation process (averaging 6 months) and the time required for system stabilisation and user training. The current process for capturing disposition at the alert level delays ROI reporting, which the sales teams need for end-of-year assessments and contract renewal. In some cases, solution rollouts have been delayed because clients cannot provide ROI figures on time.   These issues have been consistently encountered in all Viya/Visual Investigator implementations. Many of these features were available in the previous SAS Fraud Framework UI, and existing migrations cannot proceed until these issues are resolved, extending support for the older SAS Fraud Framework.   How does R&D receive client feedback and determine what is working or not working with the product? As SAS Partners, we do not have access to internal SAS systems and cannot log feature requests directly. ... View more

Hi,    Context:   Viya implemented in Azure using https://github.com/sassoftware/viya4-iac-azure. SAS admin team stated that Viya 4 does not support the use or configuration of a proxy.   Request:   To improve security posture, it will be beneficial for Viya4 to support the use of a proxy to inspect SSL traffic.   Note: Microsoft has a new feature available  (In Preview) for their Azure Kubernetes Services  which will allow to use custom CA. More information here:  Custom certificate authority (CA) in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) (preview) - Azure Kubernetes Service | Microsoft Learn| https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/custom-certificate-authority     ... View more

Hello,   Right now, when administrator wants to give access to a new user (and therefore he needs to revoke rights to some other user) he can revoke rights to a user that has open cases that are assigned to him.   I think it would be very useful for administrators to get a prompt that pops up when he tries to revoke the rights (for entering in SAS) for a user that has open cases.   Some window that will say to the admin that he first has to assign open cases to some other user before revoking rights to the current user.   Similar to prompts that can pop up when user tries to disposition the alert and he has to write disposition reason.   Thanks, David ... View more

As discussed with the customer, the user need to add/edit some information related to the closed alert. Anyway, in SAS AML8.3 the system does not allowed user to edit the comment of closed alert. Please help to consider to add the function of 'add/edit comment to alert after the alert is closed' into SAS AML8.3   Thanks! ... View more

Refer to SAS AML8.3, the system is only allow the user to perform any actions on the most recent snapshots (SFEs) for the suspicious activity that has been discovered. This is not allowed the user to add/edit the information of the previous alert. This affects the work process of user as below 1) If the user record the wrong investigation or need to re-investigated the information in the previous alert. 2) The user need to see the attachment in alert level   So, the expectation from the customer are 1) When the new Alert is generated, the user should be able to ‘Edit’ some information in ‘the previous Alert’ such as.. ‘Rate productivity’ to put the comment (in Fired Event Level) for that alert 2) The user can distinguish between the attachment of alert level ... View more

Date formatting in SAS VI / LEI is controlled by browser language settings. For example if your browser language setting is English UK then dates will be UK formatted in the UI. Whereas, if your browser language setting is English US then dates will be US formatted in the UI. Clients don't always have access to change language settings on company laptops and therefore feel it would be beneficial for SAS VI / LEI to have a global language setting in VIYA / Environment Manager that automatically formats all dates to the preferred style of the client. ... View more

The disposition list on Alert detail screen should contain only the list that authorized by user queue.   For example The Manager group queue and Manager Employee queue are in the same Strategy. Our user expect that the disposition button list should be displayed only disposition of that user's queue. The attachment is the Manager's screen, our user expect that the gray button will not be displayed. ... View more

For AML8.3, when the user clicks 'View the alert' to access the alert. The alert cannot be claimed (there is no function to claim/Claim is disable). Meanwhile, the user can click disposition to handle the alert.    So, if the purpose of "View the alert", to see detail inside the alert detail only. Disposition button should be grayed out in case that user click "View the alert" to access the alert. ... View more

The calendar control should allows to put the date restriction to display from the current date (VI10.8 Hot Fix6).   Our customer is using SAS AML8.3 with CDD, they specified that on the 'Customer Review' >> 'Review Details' tab, the calendar control in 'Review Time Period' section(in the attached screen) allows user to put the back date which may cause the incorrect date into the system. ... View more

 The system should allow to set the group restriction to view specific active workflow on SAS Visual Investigator Admin according to the data object authorization. ... View more

In SAS AML8.3, While the user create AML case, Case category should be reflected by Case category. ... View more

The subscribe function to send an email notification to user from any actions with their alert, case, customer and report in SAS AML8.3(to be the same with AML6.3) is necessary for our customer.    ... View more

On SAS AML on Viya 3.5 how can we apply a filter in Triage case screen.  This functionality is available on Alerts screen. Can you add it on Triage case screen?   ... View more

In SAS LEI we are using the Tripwire functionality. One of the OOTB fields for this entity is called Generate Email which is a Boolean field.  On the LEI page template that we have designed for our client the end user is required to check the box to either true or false to request the required email.   This field is displayed on the page template as a check box with the pre determined value of false.  The client is requesting that this check box is automatically checked to true from the outset rather than the end user having to check the box.   From conversations with Tech Support and R&D we know that this is not possible within the current solution and have suggested a feature request whereby the person building the SAS LEI configuration can set the Boolean value / check box to either true or false when designing the page template. ... View more

Third party tools like Sonar Cloud do not offer SAS code connectors, that means that it is not possible  to review customized SAS code on vulnerabilities and or quality. To be sure that we deploy and expose secure code it would be beneficial to have a code review tool from SAS.      ... View more