BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
RyanDHS
Calcite | Level 5

I have data at the level of US Counties (level 1) nested within their respective State (level 2) and I have both predictors at the county level and the state level. My understanding was always that Proc Mixed determines the level of the variable in the model based on whether there is variability at each level. In this example, I have the population of the county (pop10) as a predictor and the way the state votes relative to others (CPVI), both ratio scales. My syntax is below:

 

proc mixed data = sor covtest ;
class STATE ;
model SORgc = pop10 CPVI /s DDFM=sat ;
random int / sub=STATE ;
ods output SolutionR = Res2;
run;

 

The ODS output fails because there are no level 2 residuals and the degrees of freedom suggest it is treating my level 2 variable CVPI as a level 1 predictor. I've attached the data file. I've checked that there is no variance in the variables at the state level (see second tab in excel sheet) and made sure everything is a number and everything I can possibly think of. SAS is doing the grouping right because it shows the number of subjects correctly (not all states are included).  Am I missing something really obvious?

RyanDHS_0-1723061343079.png

RyanDHS_1-1723061646454.png

 

 

1 REPLY 1

sas-innovate-wordmark-2025-midnight.png

Register Today!

Join us for SAS Innovate 2025, our biggest and most exciting global event of the year, in Orlando, FL, from May 6-9. Sign up by March 14 for just $795.


Register now!

What is Bayesian Analysis?

Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 1 reply
  • 572 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation