Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Home
- /
- Analytics
- /
- Stat Procs
- /
- Which test can I perform o show that one model is better than the othe...

Options

- RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

🔒 This topic is **solved** and **locked**.
Need further help from the community? Please
sign in and ask a **new** question.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted 03-08-2018 08:28 AM
(1588 views)

I have two models estimating the same number of parameters and using the same data. The models are only different because they are using different different likelihood functions in the proc nlmixed procedure.

I mean this;

```
proc nlmixed data=Surveydata;
parms b0=0 b1=0 ;
mean = exp(b0 + b1*Age);
ll = /*Some codes*/;
model art ~ general(ll);
run;
proc nlmixed data=Surveydata;
parms b0=0 b1=0 ;
mean = exp(b0 + b1*Age);
ll = /*Some codes different from those above*/;
model art ~ general(ll);
run;
```

Therefore expect different estimates for variable Age. So my question is this Apart from AIC or BIC what test can I use especially that I can incorporate with simulation to justify that one model is better than the other. The test may even focus on the ability of the estimates of the parameter Age to best explain the variable art. But most of all I would really want to simulate different data sets to use the test just to justify that for different data sets Model X is better than Model 2.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

I assume the different LL represent different models, such as comparing Poisson, Neg Bionomial, ZIP, etc.

In simulation studies, people are often interested in

1. Bias. You can examine the distribution of (theta - theta_hat) where theta_hat is the Monte Carlo estimate

2. If the purpose of the study is to assess a point estimate, then the standard error of the MC estimates are important (precision)

3. If the purpose is to assess a confidence interval, then empirical coverage probability is important.

2 REPLIES 2

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

I assume the different LL represent different models, such as comparing Poisson, Neg Bionomial, ZIP, etc.

In simulation studies, people are often interested in

1. Bias. You can examine the distribution of (theta - theta_hat) where theta_hat is the Monte Carlo estimate

2. If the purpose of the study is to assess a point estimate, then the standard error of the MC estimates are important (precision)

3. If the purpose is to assess a confidence interval, then empirical coverage probability is important.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Are you ready for the spotlight? We're accepting content ideas for **SAS Innovate 2025** to be held May 6-9 in Orlando, FL. The call is **open **until September 25. Read more here about **why** you should contribute and **what is in it** for you!

What is ANOVA?

ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.