Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Find a Community

- Home
- /
- Health Care and Pharma
- /
- SAS in Health Care Related Fields
- /
- Repeated Measures and missing values due to mortal...

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

01-14-2008 04:24 PM

Hello,

I am comparing the difference in shell area (mm^2) between two species of clams under ambient environmental conditions over a one year period using monthly measurement intervals. Unfortunately, part-way into the experiment the clams of both species started experiencing heavy mortality (i.e. “Species 1” – 38% mortality at month 4, and 94% mortality at month 8; “Species 2” – 7% mortality at month 4, and 50% at month 8).

As a consequence, I have many missing values in my data set due to this mortality.

I know that SAS usually drops subjects with missing variables in PROC MIXED and GLM.

Does anyone know a way to do a Repeated Measures analysis on growth measurements without loosing the data from the dead organisms?

Thanks.

I am comparing the difference in shell area (mm^2) between two species of clams under ambient environmental conditions over a one year period using monthly measurement intervals. Unfortunately, part-way into the experiment the clams of both species started experiencing heavy mortality (i.e. “Species 1” – 38% mortality at month 4, and 94% mortality at month 8; “Species 2” – 7% mortality at month 4, and 50% at month 8).

As a consequence, I have many missing values in my data set due to this mortality.

I know that SAS usually drops subjects with missing variables in PROC MIXED and GLM.

Does anyone know a way to do a Repeated Measures analysis on growth measurements without loosing the data from the dead organisms?

Thanks.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to deleted_user

01-16-2008 05:03 PM

I thought SAS dropped subjects with missing data for proc anova and proc glm, but NOT proc mixed.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to 1162

01-17-2008 03:14 PM

Thanks, but I'm positive SAS drops subjects with missing data for PROC ANOVA, GLM, and MIXED...I've tried doing my analysis with all three. If you know of any other procedure that might be helpful though, I'd like to hear it.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to deleted_user

01-18-2008 11:26 AM

I wonder if I'm misunderstanding the issue because as far as I understand things, you should be getting different results with PROC GLM and PROC MIXED for repeated measures. In the Class Levels section of the GLM output, are you getting a note that observations have been removed due to missing data? In the Dimensions section of the PROC MIXED output, how many observations are used and not used? Does the number used match the total number of non-missing values or just for the subjects with complete data?

I found this in the SAS Course Notes for Mixed Model Analyses:

"In the presence of missing repeated measures for a subject, the MIXED procedure does not exclude this subject from the analysis; instead it uses all the available data. This method (likelihood-based ignorable analysis) leads to a valid analysis when the missing data can be assumed missing at random (MAR)."

Unfortunately, it doesn't sound like your data is missing at random, so there might be better methods than PROC MIXED anyway.

Here are some other web links about this topic:

http://support.sas.com/rnd/app/papers/mixedglm.pdf

http://www.stat.lsu.edu/faculty/moser/exst7037/repeatedpres.pdf

http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/faq/mixmiss.htm

There is an example in the third link that shows how GLM drops 4 of the 8 subjects because of missing data, but MIXED uses the available data from all 8 subjects. The two methods produce different p-values because of this.

I found this in the SAS Course Notes for Mixed Model Analyses:

"In the presence of missing repeated measures for a subject, the MIXED procedure does not exclude this subject from the analysis; instead it uses all the available data. This method (likelihood-based ignorable analysis) leads to a valid analysis when the missing data can be assumed missing at random (MAR)."

Unfortunately, it doesn't sound like your data is missing at random, so there might be better methods than PROC MIXED anyway.

Here are some other web links about this topic:

http://support.sas.com/rnd/app/papers/mixedglm.pdf

http://www.stat.lsu.edu/faculty/moser/exst7037/repeatedpres.pdf

http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/sas/faq/mixmiss.htm

There is an example in the third link that shows how GLM drops 4 of the 8 subjects because of missing data, but MIXED uses the available data from all 8 subjects. The two methods produce different p-values because of this.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to 1162

01-23-2008 12:07 PM

Thanks for the help!

Actually, It was I who was misunderstanding the issue. I started to finally figure that out, and then your response confirmed it for me. Thanks for the links as well, I really appreciate it!

Actually, It was I who was misunderstanding the issue. I started to finally figure that out, and then your response confirmed it for me. Thanks for the links as well, I really appreciate it!