Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Find a Community

- Home
- /
- Analytics
- /
- Stat Procs
- /
- <0.001 >999.999 Error Conditional Logistic Regress...

- RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

03-31-2016 02:11 PM

I have a data set of 274 people with 137 cases and 137 controls matched on w, x, y and z. I am doing a conditional logistic for multiple different exposures and testing effect measure modification by sex. I was going to check confounding too (related to x, related to y among unexposed and not on the causal pathway) but I am coming up with very odd values in my output. It says that the convergence criterion is satisfied and the data seems to be formatting correctly and there are no missing values.

This is my code:

proc logistic data=data; /*outcome = suicide. exposure = sex*/

strata ccmatchid;

model sample_index (event='1') = b_dm02; run;

Odds Ratio Estimates Effect

b_DM02

Point Estimate

>999.999

95% Wald Confidence Limits

<0.001 >999.999

Accepted Solutions

Solution

06-14-2018
09:31 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to sharpmelk

06-14-2018 09:30 AM

All Replies

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to sharpmelk

03-31-2016 02:22 PM

The odds ratio is the ratio of two numbers. It looks like the denominator is zero or very close to zero. The estimate for the odds ratio is very big ("infinity") which is displaying as > 999.999.

The Wald confidence interval about 1 is similalry undefnied. Essentially you can interpret it as (0, infinity), which gives you no information.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to Rick_SAS

03-31-2016 02:45 PM - edited 03-31-2016 06:38 PM

It is indicative of a larger problem, no? I should be able to easy test to see if sex is a predictor of suicide. I need to include it in all of my conditional logisit models (testing for effect measure modification). The variable works with McNemar's test so it doesn't seem to be a variable-level issue.

Solution

06-14-2018
09:31 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to sharpmelk

06-14-2018 09:30 AM