Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Find a Community

- Home
- /
- Analytics
- /
- Stat Procs
- /
- Using Proc FMM to mix a Normal and Degenerate dist...

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

04-26-2013 08:09 PM

Hello everyone,

I'm exploring the experimental Proc FMM procedure, and I've run into an issue that doesn't make sense to me.

I would like to use Proc FMM to model normally distributed biological data that has a lower limit of detection (LLD), where there are many observations at the LLD value. It would be great to use Proc FMM to find the mixing probabilities for the normal and degenerate distribution at the LLD value. However, I've found that in Proc FMM, the constant distribution will not mix with the normal or the truncated normal distribution. The constant distribution works well with the Poisson and Negative Binomial distributions, so I'm not sure why it doesn't work with the normal. I'm not sure if this is just a functionality that is not available currently, of if I'm missing something.

Here is some example code that demonstrates this issue:

data testing(keep=num); *Randomly generates 1,000 observations from N(1,1);

do i=1 to 1000;

num = 1 + 1*rannor(0);

output;

end;

run;

data testing2; set testing; *Sets anything below 0 (the example LLD value) to 0;

if num <0 then x=0; else x=num;

run;

proc fmm data=testing2 componentinfo; *Proc FMM Normal distribution mixing with a degenerate distribution at the LLD value, 0;

model x=/ dist=normal;

model + /dist=constant(0);

run;

Thanks for the help!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to alynnlaurie

04-29-2013 09:16 AM

I ran the code using my current installation (SAS/STAT12.1 TS1M2), and it ran without a problem. I got a much better fit to the data using a truncnormal(0,.) option in the first model statement.

If it is not running, I suspect that you are on an earlier version, where these problems have been corrected.

Steve Denham

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to SteveDenham

04-30-2013 07:19 AM

Well, maybe truncnormal gives a better fit visually. However, the log likelihood and IC values would point to a normal.

Steve Denham

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to SteveDenham

04-30-2013 05:21 PM

Thank you for running this, Steve. I am running Base SAS 9.3 TS1M0. I will see if my institution has access to the TS1M1 or TS1M2 update for base, and hope that will fix the problem. It's exciting to hear that it works since I hope to use this to model a variety of data censored by a lower limit of detection.