BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
kelSAS
Obsidian | Level 7

I have a multiple regression equation with year and industry fixed effect as below.

y = x1 + D + x1*D + FE + error (x1 is continuous and D is binary)

and I have another dummy variable (let's say, Z = 0 or 1).

What I want to see is if the coefficients on x1*D are statistically significantly different for the subsample Z =1 and Z=0. 

 

What I have tried is 3-way interaction (x1*D*Z). However, because of fixed effects, the difference in the coefficient on x1*D from separate regression for Z=0 and Z=1 is not the same as the coefficient on 3-way interaction. (Separate regression allows the error term to vary separately whereas 3-way interaction multiple regression does not)

 

In the end, what I want is 3 columns with the coefficients for Z=0, Z=1, and the difference. Is there some type of test in SAS where I can achieve this?

3 REPLIES 3
pau13rown
Lapis Lazuli | Level 10

sounds like a subgroup analysis stratifying by z. The interaction then is the right way to go. You'd use an estimate statement for the difference and lsmeans statement for the group estimates. Although i'm not sure i understand your description of the model. Is year fixed or is year x1? what is FE? etc

kelSAS
Obsidian | Level 7

I apologize that my explanation was inadequate. FE is for fixed effect. So original model looks like below.

y = α1 x1 + α2 D + α3 x1*D + α4 d_1990 + α5 d_1991 + ... + d_2017 + d_sic1 + d_sic2 + ... + d_sic48 + error

where d_1990 to d_2017 are year dummies and d_sic1 to d_sic48 are industry dummies.

 

What I want is to look at the difference in α3 for the sample with Z=0 and the sample with Z=1. 

 

But because of FE (fixed effects) that are laid out as d_1990 to d_2017 and d_sic1 to d_sic48, if I run the regression separately for Z=0 group and Z=1 group, the the difference in α3 from the two regressions is not the same as the coefficient on 3-way interaction (x1*D*Z) from 1 multiple regression with bunch of interactions.

 

I know the intuition and interpretation won't be different, but I need the numbers (the difference and the 3-way interaction) to be the same to put in my result table. 

pau13rown
Lapis Lazuli | Level 10

why do you create indicator variables instead of using a class statement? Running the models separately versus using an interaction won't necessarily give exactly the same result; i would use the interaction, others have discussed it in detail eg: https://www.lexjansen.com/pharmasug/2009/po/PO08.pdf

https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Statistical-Procedures/How-to-do-subgroup-analysis/td-p/82638

sas-innovate-2024.png

Join us for SAS Innovate April 16-19 at the Aria in Las Vegas. Bring the team and save big with our group pricing for a limited time only.

Pre-conference courses and tutorials are filling up fast and are always a sellout. Register today to reserve your seat.

 

Register now!

What is ANOVA?

ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 3 replies
  • 1489 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation