turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Find a Community

- Home
- /
- Analytics
- /
- Stat Procs
- /
- Non-paramentric: reporting Wilcoxon Two-sample tes...

Topic Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

05-24-2009 10:51 PM

Hi. I am doing a lot of non-parametric testing. I am running exact Wilcoxon two-sample tests. However, I am not sure what to report from the SAS output, specifically which "statistic" to report. The outprint provides an "S" statistic and a "Z" statistic, and I'm not sure which one should be reported alng with the p-value. I don't even know what each means. Any advice you can give would be appreciated.

As well, why is the Wilcoxon p-value different than the Kruskal Wallis test p-value? I wlways thought these two tests were comparable with a 2-level independent variable.

Thanks again.

As well, why is the Wilcoxon p-value different than the Kruskal Wallis test p-value? I wlways thought these two tests were comparable with a 2-level independent variable.

Thanks again.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

05-25-2009 10:02 AM

First, the standard Wilcoxon (or Mann-Whitney) two sample test is equivalent to the Kruskal-Wallis test when there are just two groups. The p-values are not the same because the normal approximation includes a continuity correction. Form the documentation: "The normal approximation includes a continuity correction. To remove this, you can specify the CORRECT=NO option. "

The "S" statistic is pretty much useless for external reports because it's magnitude is a function of the sample size. There is a one-to-one correspondence between the uncorrected Z statistic and the p-value, so I generally just report the p-value.

Doc Muhlbaier

Duke

The "S" statistic is pretty much useless for external reports because it's magnitude is a function of the sample size. There is a one-to-one correspondence between the uncorrected Z statistic and the p-value, so I generally just report the p-value.

Doc Muhlbaier

Duke