BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
mostater
Obsidian | Level 7
In a logistic regression, I have a categorical variable (3 levels) which the type III analysis of effects shows as non-significant (p >.05). Yet in the model parameter estimates, one of the individual parameters is significant (p <.05).

I thought the type III analysis tests that at least one of the betas is not zero. So I was assuming that, if the overall effect is non-significant, then none of the individual betas (2 in my case) would be significant as well. Is my thinking wrong? Is this a multiple testing issue?

Thanks for any help you can offer!
2 REPLIES 2
lvm
Rhodochrosite | Level 12 lvm
Rhodochrosite | Level 12
A significant individual parameter in your case could simply be due to a type I error.
mostater
Obsidian | Level 7
Thanks lvm. I'm wondering the same thing but wanted to make sure that I wasn't overlooking something or not thinking through the problem correctly.

sas-innovate-2024.png

Don't miss out on SAS Innovate - Register now for the FREE Livestream!

Can't make it to Vegas? No problem! Watch our general sessions LIVE or on-demand starting April 17th. Hear from SAS execs, best-selling author Adam Grant, Hot Ones host Sean Evans, top tech journalist Kara Swisher, AI expert Cassie Kozyrkov, and the mind-blowing dance crew iLuminate! Plus, get access to over 20 breakout sessions.

 

Register now!

What is ANOVA?

ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 2 replies
  • 1249 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation