BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
☑ This topic is solved. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
Davejones
Obsidian | Level 7

Hi Experts,

 

Proc GLMselect model is based on AIC. however, it occasionally picks up non-significant variable in the final Parameter Estimates table. Is a better way to improve the "stepwise" selection method instead of pre-selecting the "p<0.05" variables? 

 

Thanks

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION
4 REPLIES 4
sbxkoenk
SAS Super FREQ

Hello,

 

PROC GLMSELECT will occasionally select an input variable whose parameter estimate has a p-value above 5%.
Surely this is not a bad thing at all. If it improves the overall AIC(C), that's OK anyway.


In my opinion, there is no way to avoid this. You can only play (i.e. trial-and-error) with

Criteria Used in Model Selection Methods (the CHOOSE=, SELECT=, and STOP= options in the MODEL).

One or more settings will probably produce a model of which all parameters are significant according to the 5% significance level.

 

SAS/STAT® 15.3 User's Guide
The GLMSELECT Procedure
Criteria Used in Model Selection Methods

https://go.documentation.sas.com/doc/en/statug/15.3/statug_glmselect_details15.htm

 

Good luck,

Koen

Davejones
Obsidian | Level 7

Thanks Koen for your help!

As p>n, tried to use both Lasso and elasticnet, and got inconsistent outputs too.

sbxkoenk
SAS Super FREQ

Hello,

 

If the number of variables / features is higher than the number of observations / samples, the data are considered high-dimensional and require dimension reduction approaches.

 

Koen

hackathon24-white-horiz.png

The 2025 SAS Hackathon has begun!

It's finally time to hack! Remember to visit the SAS Hacker's Hub regularly for news and updates.

Latest Updates

How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 4 replies
  • 1109 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation