07-18-2017 10:37 PM
I am working on modeling data.
By using "Proc univariate" to fit data, distribution that I get is Gamma with theta=60500 and Pareto with theta=300000.
then, I simulate data from these distributions by using code as follow:
%let NumSamples = 120;
data simu.pareto1(keep=ID X);
do ID = 1 to &NumSamples;
a = 0.383045;
k = 222548.1;
do i = 1 to &N;
U = rand("Uniform");
X = k / U**(1/a);
but the output seems deviate from the fitted data quite much. I'm not sure if it's relevant with the unspecify theta on my code or not?
If yes, please let me know the code for simulation with specify theta (for both Gamma and Pareto).
07-19-2017 04:50 AM
You can simulate some random variate Y with threshold parameter theta (and possibly a scale parameter sigma, by using the RAND function as you do to create the standard variate X and then create Y = theta + sigma * X.
Your way of simulating a standard Pareto looks good if you want to do this in a datastep, since the RAND function does not support the Pareto distribution. The RANDGEN function in SAS/IML does however support it, so you can do it directly there. The RAND function also supports the Gamma distribution, so simply simulate a Gamma random variate and apply the transformation above.
07-19-2017 02:24 PM
Yes, your Pareto simulation is identical to the one on p. 113 of Simulating Data with SAS.
If you look at pp. 109-111, there is a section on "Adding Location and Scale Parameters."
Just add the Theta value:
X = Theta_Pareto + k / U**(1/a);
Similarly for the gamma simulation, use
G = Theta_gamma + rand("gamma", <scale param here>);
You can simulate it in the same DATA step that simulates the Pareto variable.
07-25-2017 04:54 AM - edited 07-25-2017 04:55 AM
Thank you very much for your kind suggestion above.
However, after I did as per your suggestion, I found out many issues as following:
Fitting Pareto distribution -> output1
Simulation without theta -> output2 (after cut off data, so the data range of is 300,000-800,000)
Simulation with theta -> output3 (after cut off data, so the data range of is 300,000-800,000)
As you can see that, the statistic of simulation with theta are different from the fitted Pareto quite much. I am not sure if these output are acceptable or not? If not, please let have your further suggestion.
07-25-2017 10:14 AM
1. If you want us to match data, you need to supply some sample data in the form of a SAS DATA step. It is difficult to guess what difficulties you might be having without a common set of data that everyone can run.
2. Numerically speaking, I would suggest measuring units in thousands, so that your data are 300-800 (with theta =300). This is likely to be more robust.