turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Find a Community

- Home
- /
- SAS Programming
- /
- SAS Procedures
- /
- exploratory factor analysis

Topic Options

- RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

04-03-2014 11:40 AM

Hi,

I have a data set of 3784 participants (no missing data) who answered 16 General Human papillomavirus (a disease) knowledge items. As an example (HPV is rare) These items were asked as true, false and I don't know. I want to examine how many factors should be retained. I conducted an exploratory factor analysis (see below).

My results indicate 1 factor (by looking at eigenvalues >1, and the scree plot). This is great, as we were hoping for unidimensionality of this scale

I am wondering if I should try a rotation ? I believe a rotation is not appropriate since I have 1 factor

Thanks,

proc

**factor** data=WORK.A method=principal nfactor=**16** heywood scree;

var Q28A Q28B Q28C Q28D Q28E Q28F Q28G Q28H Q28I Q28J Q28K Q28L Q28M Q28N Q28O Q28P;

run

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to statsgirl

09-13-2016 07:49 PM

Hi Statsgirl, you don't need to rotate if you have one factor but if you do you might find the results to be only slightly different than your unrotated solution.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to statsgirl

09-15-2016 01:55 PM

Since all of your values fall into one of 3 categories, PROC FACTOR may not be your best choice for analysis. Take a look at PROC CORRESP for correspondence analysis, and in particular, you might find Example 34.1 Simple and Multipple Correspondence Analysis of Automobiles and Their Owners as a good analogy to your data.

Correspondence analysis avoids the assumption that the data are continuous (or at least ordinal) and thus might be a better fit.

Steve Denham