turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Find a Community

- Home
- /
- SAS Programming
- /
- SAS Procedures
- /
- What consititutes a non-normal distribution of res...

Topic Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

10-12-2016 12:02 PM

I have used PROC MIXED to fit a repeated measures spatial model to some spectrogram data (i.e. time-frequency representations). The datasets are quite large, 10800 data points. Following the advice stom Steve Denham in an earlier post, I checked the distribution of residuals. Despite looking like a very nice gaussian distribution, the skew is -0.016 and kurtosis 1.347. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov D test = 0.0185 Pr > D <0.0100. So, strictly speaking this distribution departs significantly from normal. I assume that the reason for this has more to do with the (relatively) large sample, and that I probably should not worry. Nevertheless, being a worrier i would really appreciate some advice.

Many thanks in advance

Piers_C

Accepted Solutions

Solution

10-18-2016
05:02 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to Piers_C

10-13-2016 10:53 AM

As you say, the K-S test will reject for such as large sample. Clearly the residuals are symmetric, which is probably the most important feature. There is evidence of kurtosis, which could mean a heavier-tailed distribution of errors, but might also indicate slight heteroscedasity.

Without seeing the data, this looks like a good fit. If these were my data, I would plot residuals versus explanatory variables. Do any of the patterns of residuals look "fan shaped"?

All Replies

Solution

10-18-2016
05:02 AM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to Piers_C

10-13-2016 10:53 AM

As you say, the K-S test will reject for such as large sample. Clearly the residuals are symmetric, which is probably the most important feature. There is evidence of kurtosis, which could mean a heavier-tailed distribution of errors, but might also indicate slight heteroscedasity.

Without seeing the data, this looks like a good fit. If these were my data, I would plot residuals versus explanatory variables. Do any of the patterns of residuals look "fan shaped"?