Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Find a Community

- Home
- /
- SAS Programming
- /
- SAS Procedures
- /
- PROC REG and variance components

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

03-31-2009 04:26 PM

I'm running PROC REG usimg a model with about 125 variables. What I'd like to do is to be able to estimate the relative contribution of each variable to the Model Sums of Squares. The Type I SS add up to the MODEL SS, but I believe it is dependent on the order of the variables in the model statement. Does anyone know a way to get the variance components that is not affected by the order of variables in the MODEL statement?

Thanks!

Thanks!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to Mercator

04-01-2009 08:07 AM

Sadly, I don't think the question has a meaningful answer.

Unless your 125 variables are statistically uncorrelated with one another (I doubt you can do this), then they are correlated with one another, and you cannot treat them as uncorrelated and say this variable accounts for 5% of the response, and this variable accounts for 3.7% and so on.

This is not a problem with SAS. This is a problem with the question that is being asked in this situation.

Unless your 125 variables are statistically uncorrelated with one another (I doubt you can do this), then they are correlated with one another, and you cannot treat them as uncorrelated and say this variable accounts for 5% of the response, and this variable accounts for 3.7% and so on.

This is not a problem with SAS. This is a problem with the question that is being asked in this situation.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to Mercator

04-15-2009 10:31 AM

Hi,

If what you are interested in is contribution of each variable**when all other variables are included in the model**, then you can use Type III SS.

If what you are interested in is contribution of each variable

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to statsplank

04-16-2009 09:04 AM

> If what you are interested in is contribution of each

> variable**when all other variables are included in**

> the model, then you can use Type III SS.

Using the Type III SS to tell you the contribution to total variability explained of each individual variable is a nice idea, but it doesn't really make a lot of sense when you have 125 variables which are correlated with one another. In fact, I wouldn't recommend PROC REG in this case at all; instead I would use PROC PLS.

> variable

> the model

Using the Type III SS to tell you the contribution to total variability explained of each individual variable is a nice idea, but it doesn't really make a lot of sense when you have 125 variables which are correlated with one another. In fact, I wouldn't recommend PROC REG in this case at all; instead I would use PROC PLS.