turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Find a Community

- Home
- /
- SAS Programming
- /
- SAS Procedures
- /
- MEANING? Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisf...

Topic Options

- RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

Highlighted
# MEANING? Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied

Options

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

07-15-2012 06:47 AM

I am using some logistic regression testing and I have received this message.

Not quite sure what this means...

My coefficients are pleasingly significant. I performed an AUTO CORR command to see whether autocorrelation could corrupt my results however the results are good. So is this message "*Convergence criterion* (*GCONV*=*1E*-*8*) *satisfied" normal? *

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to spraynardz90

07-15-2012 01:12 PM

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to PGStats

07-16-2012 07:23 AM

Thanks very much. Could you please help me solve below? I have ensured my dependent variable is either 1 or 0 and my independents are different.

I received this message when performing some of my testing:

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to spraynardz90

07-16-2012 12:32 PM

The screen image is very fuzzy, I can't read everything. The error says that among the observations where all variables are not missing (only those are considered) the dependent variable always has the same value. This could be caused by all the logs involved, if missing values were generated when calculating them, in a previous step.

PG

PG

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to PGStats

08-05-2012 03:15 AM

I have received a warning message saying "ridging has failed to improve the log likelihood" and the validity of the fit is questionable.

I have four different dummy variables in this regression, the dependent, and three control independents. Do you think this could cause the error?

I have checked for duplicates, blanks in the dummies, and auto correlation, all seem to be OK

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to spraynardz90

08-05-2012 09:30 PM

I would start by looking at the table produced by

**proc freq data=yourData;**

**tables logsd*yourdum1*yourdum2*yourdum3*yourdum4 / list nocum nopercent;**

**run;**

and check for combinations that are not well represented in your data.

PG

PG

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to PGStats

01-20-2016 06:31 AM

Hi,

I was searching for the meaining of GCONV=1E-8 which led me to this post. However I am not able to see your reply. I have attached the screenshot for your reference. Thanks in advance for your help.

Thanks,

Ved

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to ved_sharma

01-22-2016 10:54 AM

This note means that the relative gradient (max of the first derivatives wrt to the fixed effect parameters)/ absolute value of the objective function has reached a near zero value (0.00000001), thus you are at a maximum/minimum/saddle point of the objective function. Changing parameter values won't improve the fit to the data.

Steve Denham