BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
benbuck
Obsidian | Level 7

Hi all,

 

I am running the following two procedures and getting different two very different results and can't figure out why:

 

proc tabulate data = index_ablations_all_years;
	class  ind_heavy_flag;
	table ind_heavy_flag, n colpctn*f=round10th. / nocellmerge;
	freq ind_DISCWT;
run;*/

proc freq data = index_ablations_all_years;
table ind_heavy_flag;
weight ind_DISCWT;
run;

This is running on SAS 9.4 on Windows 10, 64 bit.

 

Thanks for any help!

Ben

 

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Reeza
Super User

PROC TABULATE has both a FREQ and WEIGHT statement and they operate a little differently. 

Try using WEIGHT in both procedures if that's what you have. 

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4
andreas_lds
Jade | Level 19

you might want to post data so that we can see the differences. 

Astounding
PROC Star

Do you have any missing values for IND_HEAVY_FLAG?  Without the MISSING option, PROC TABULATE throws those out entirely.  

Reeza
Super User

PROC TABULATE has both a FREQ and WEIGHT statement and they operate a little differently. 

Try using WEIGHT in both procedures if that's what you have. 

Cynthia_sas
Diamond | Level 26
Hi:
And COLPCTN could generate a different result than just PCTN. Missing might come into play as already noted -- without the MISSING option, TABULATE excludes missing CLASS values from the TABLE.

cynthia

hackathon24-white-horiz.png

The 2025 SAS Hackathon has begun!

It's finally time to hack! Remember to visit the SAS Hacker's Hub regularly for news and updates.

Latest Updates

What is Bayesian Analysis?

Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 4 replies
  • 1659 views
  • 0 likes
  • 5 in conversation