BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
telescopic
Calcite | Level 5

Hi, I have problem on 'exp' function. Please see the bolded line in code.

    a = exp( (-lamda*Y)**gamma )    ;     

where gamma and lamda is (1x1) matrix or scalar. Without "exp", The routine return the value f. But, adding  'exp', it returns error!

Error message-----------------------------------------------------------------

ERROR: (execution) Invalid argument to function.

operation : EXP at line 925 column 12

operands  : _TEM1004

_TEM1004      1 row       1 col     (numeric)

    194481

statement : ASSIGN at line 925 column 5

traceback : module LOGLIK at line 925 column 5

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I cannot see the reason. Maybe it is due to issue on applying function  elementwise versus on a matrix?

Thank you

Elvin

CODE:

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Data radiotherapy;

   input y age gender $ censor_ind;

datalines;

7 68 f 1

9 69 f 1

12 68 f    1

12 71 f    1

19 77 m    1

23 70 f    1

;

RUN;

PROC IML;

RESET LOG PRINT;

USE radiotherapy VAR _ALL_;

READ all VAR{y} INTO Y;

READ all VAR{age} INTO AGE;

READ all VAR{gender} INTO GENDER;

READ all VAR{censor_ind} INTO CENSOR_IND;

CLOSE radiotherapy;

start LogLik(param) global (Y);

   lamda = param[1];

   gamma = param[2];

   n = nrow(Y);

   f=0;

    DO i=1 to nrow(Y);

    a = exp( (-lamda*Y)**gamma )    ;      

    f=f+a;

    END;

    return ( f );

finish;

p={3 4, 6 9};

ans=LogLik(p);

quit;

3 REPLIES 3
telescopic
Calcite | Level 5

Woops, I think the issue is that the values in my vector 'p' are too small. :smileysilly:

By the way, in IML, can we assign a value as scalar  instead to a (1x1) matrix?

Thank you

Elvin

TomTom
Calcite | Level 5

telescopic wrote:

 

By the way, in IML, can we assign a value as scalar  instead to a (1x1) matrix?


1x1 matrices are scalars

http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/imlug/64248/HTML/default/viewer.htm#imlug_languagechap_s...

The main problem with your programme above is that in your likelihood module the result of the calculation of EXP(194481) is too big for the computer to handle. I think you also want to pass rows of p as arguments to LogLik and not the whole matrix. I suppose you have seen Rick's recent blog post. If not, have a look at what he did:

http://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2011/10/12/maximum-likelihood-estimation-in-sasiml/

Rick_SAS
SAS Super FREQ

By the way, you don't need the loop over all elements of Y.

start LogLik(param) global (Y);

   lamda = param[1];

   gamma = param[2];

   f = sum( exp((-lamda*Y)##gamma) );

   return ( f );

finish;

sas-innovate-2024.png

Don't miss out on SAS Innovate - Register now for the FREE Livestream!

Can't make it to Vegas? No problem! Watch our general sessions LIVE or on-demand starting April 17th. Hear from SAS execs, best-selling author Adam Grant, Hot Ones host Sean Evans, top tech journalist Kara Swisher, AI expert Cassie Kozyrkov, and the mind-blowing dance crew iLuminate! Plus, get access to over 20 breakout sessions.

 

Register now!

Multiple Linear Regression in SAS

Learn how to run multiple linear regression models with and without interactions, presented by SAS user Alex Chaplin.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

From The DO Loop
Want more? Visit our blog for more articles like these.
Discussion stats
  • 3 replies
  • 2631 views
  • 0 likes
  • 3 in conversation