BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
LauriN
Calcite | Level 5

This way it works, had to put that option and constrain vector both into the input parentheses:

Now I get no division by 0 warning. The previously miss-specified-due-loss-of-precision point's are now not specified at all and the value is substituted by 0.14 but the error isn't likely big.

start mincvf(CVF1);

con={0.14 . .,. . .,. . .};

optn={0,0};

init=1;

call nlpqn(rc, res,"CVF1",init,optn,con);

return (res);

finish;

Thanks for the help!

hackathon24-white-horiz.png

The 2025 SAS Hackathon has begun!

It's finally time to hack! Remember to visit the SAS Hacker's Hub regularly for news and updates.

Latest Updates

From The DO Loop
Want more? Visit our blog for more articles like these.
Discussion stats
  • 15 replies
  • 5527 views
  • 6 likes
  • 3 in conversation