Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Find a Community

- Home
- /
- Analytics
- /
- Forecasting
- /
- Proc ARIMA: using explanatory variables, reading c...

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

07-08-2010 11:40 AM

I noticed that the crosscorrelation plot shows both positive and negative lags. I have a situation where only lag -1 has a significant crosscorrelation, but I don't think that is actionable?? I've prewhitened and taken the first difference of the response series and the explanatory variable. Thanks!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

07-09-2010 07:42 AM

Hello -

The cross-correlation test of two time-series data sets involves many calculations of the correlation r by time-shifting the one data set relative to the other data set. Each shift is called a "lag", and the lag time is simply the sampling period of the two time-series data sets. A typical cross-correlation graph shows enough lags in both negative and positive directions to show the cyclical relationship of the two sets of data.

Does that help?

Regards,

Udo

The cross-correlation test of two time-series data sets involves many calculations of the correlation r by time-shifting the one data set relative to the other data set. Each shift is called a "lag", and the lag time is simply the sampling period of the two time-series data sets. A typical cross-correlation graph shows enough lags in both negative and positive directions to show the cyclical relationship of the two sets of data.

Does that help?

Regards,

Udo

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

07-09-2010 09:20 AM

Hello Udo,

Thank you, that does help shed light on the purpose of the crosscorrelation graph. In lieu of any cyclical relationship, is the significant crosscorrelation at lag -1 actionable? I am interpreting to results to mean that the explanatory variable is not useful.

Thanks!

Thank you, that does help shed light on the purpose of the crosscorrelation graph. In lieu of any cyclical relationship, is the significant crosscorrelation at lag -1 actionable? I am interpreting to results to mean that the explanatory variable is not useful.

Thanks!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

07-20-2010 05:37 AM

Hello -

Not sure of your specific situation, but there are cases where a crosscorrelation value of -1 is of practical usage. See for example: http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/75/7/1891.pdf. Taken from there: "The significant negative crosscorrelation between milk yield and cholesterol on the same day suggests that serum cholesterol may be removed in milk or, more probably, that alterations in metabolism required for increased milk yield result in lower blood cholesterol."

Regards,

Udo Message was edited by: udo@sas

Not sure of your specific situation, but there are cases where a crosscorrelation value of -1 is of practical usage. See for example: http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/75/7/1891.pdf. Taken from there: "The significant negative crosscorrelation between milk yield and cholesterol on the same day suggests that serum cholesterol may be removed in milk or, more probably, that alterations in metabolism required for increased milk yield result in lower blood cholesterol."

Regards,

Udo Message was edited by: udo@sas