turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Find a Community

- Home
- /
- Analytics
- /
- Data Mining
- /
- When should I not transform a variable?

Topic Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

06-16-2017 06:15 PM

Hi everyone,

In regression modelling (logistic regression and linear regression), when is it not best to transform a variable? In other words:

- If a variable is normally distributed but has a very large range, should it still be transformed?

- Should binary variables be transformed? if not, why?

- What other reasons are there not to transform a variable?

Thanks

Paul

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to frupaul

06-16-2017 06:50 PM

I am not a statistician, so am responding based only on experience (and the stats I learned getting a PhD in Educational Psychology) and to insure that I see the responses with those with more expertise (hi @Rick_SAS )

In my experience the principal reason for doing any transformation is when you have a distribution that you assume, or theory suggests, that it comes from a factor that has something other than a normal distribution.

I know regarding insurance claims that it holds for binary variables, as frequency of insurance claims (a binary variable: have or don't have a claim( is one such distribution.

Art, CEO, AnalystFinder.com

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to art297

06-17-2017 08:12 PM

Thanks, but surely by transforming a binary variable, you will completely ruin your chances of making any meaningful interpretations from them.

Is the presence of outliers a good enough reason to warrant a transformation? Some variables are normally distributed but have outliers. In this case, will it still be necessary to transform the variable?

Thanks

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted in reply to fbgeoff

06-18-2017 07:33 AM - edited 06-18-2017 07:34 AM

fbgeoff wrote:

Is the presence of outliers a good enough reason to warrant a transformation? Some variables are normally distributed but have outliers. In this case, will it still be necessary to transform the variable?

The answer is: it depends!

If you want your analysis to be less sensitive to outliers, then you take some action to reduce the effect of outliers — while transformation is one way to reduce the effect of outliers, it also changes the distribution of the data (which you may or may not want). A better way to reduce the effect of outliers is to run a "robust" analysis on the untransformed data, if such a "robust" analysis exists.