# SAS University Edition takes another look at survey data from the US presidential election

by on ‎01-06-2017 03:09 PM - edited on ‎01-06-2017 03:16 PM by (2,591 Views)

• ,

• ,
• ### Tips and Tricks

For today's installment of Free Data Friday, I wanted to explore data on the recent US Election and was excited to find out about the Electoral Integrity Project, which deals with how fair and democratic elections are around the world. It's a great source of open data.

Get the data

You can get the dataset from the Perception of Electoral Integrity Dataverse. I also recommend you download the questionnaire associated with the dataset, as well as the codebook, to get a better understanding of the data and the results.  From the website, the survey “…evaluates the integrity of the US presidential election held on 8 November 2016. Based on a survey collecting the views of US-based political scientists…”

How to go about getting SAS University Edition

If you don’t already have University Edition, get it here and follow the instructions from the pdf carefully. If you need help with almost any aspect of using University Edition, check out these video tutorials. Additional resources are available in this article.

The data was already in a format that I could use, and there were no missing or clearly incorrect data.

Results in a Mosaic Plot

Because this is a rather large survey with numerous categorical variables, I decided I should use mosaic plots to explore the responses.  I admit, I have never used these types of plots before as they’ve never made sense to me – but I was determined to try, and I’ve realised they are not only easy to understand, but actually very powerful tools.

Luckily for me, SAS University Edition comes with the Mosaic Plot task, so all I have to do is fill in the blanks. Behind the scenes, SAS Studio uses PROC FREQ to create the mosaic plot. SAS’ Rick Wicklin describes the concepts and code in his popular blog post about mosaic plots.

How to understand a Mosaic Plot

Basically, all the data is represented by a square; if we had only two variables (Male / Female), the example shows that a vertical line is used to split the square into the respective proportions.

If we add a second variable (the example uses Survived, 1 / 0) then the horizontal line splits each gender into the proportions for that group.  So in the example, it’s very apparent there were more males on board, but a larger percentage of women survived.  We will now take this and apply it to our Electoral data.

The first plot I’m doing is comparing “Women had equal opportunities to run for office” with “Boundaries discriminated against some parties."

So it’s very apparent that the large majority of specialists Agreed with Women having the same opportunities, and of those, the majority strongly agreed that boundaries did discriminate against some parties.  When Agree and Strongly Agree are combined the majority is overwhelming.

Next, I’ll compare “Electoral Laws were unfair to smaller parties” and “Electoral Laws favoured the governing party or parties”:

The majority of experts agreed / strongly agreed that the Electoral Laws favoured the incumbent, and that they were also unfair to the smaller parties.

The final example is “Election laws restricted citizens’ rights” and “Information about voting procedures was widely available”.  For this plot, I wanted to stratify by if the experts thought the election was rigged (there's a Stratify By field on the Mosaic plot task).  I’ll only show a couple of the interesting plots as each Response generates an output.

For all the experts that agreed that the election was rigged, the large majority agreed that information was available, but also strongly agreed that the citizens’ rights were restricted.  All the experts that disagreed that voting information was easily accessible strongly agreed that the laws restricted the rights.

What I find interesting is there seems to be a lot more variety in the answers from those experts who Strongly Disagreed about rigging in the election; there isn’t the clearly defined groups as in the above plot.

Did you find something else interesting in this data? Share in the comments. I’m glad to answer any questions.

Need data for learning?

The SAS Communities Library has a growing supply of free data sources that you can use in your training to become a data scientist. The easiest way to find articles about data sources is to type "Data for learning" in the communities site search field like so:

We publish all articles about free data sources under the Analytics U label in the SAS Communities Library. Want email notifications when we add new content? Subscribe to the Analytics U label by clicking "Find A Community" in the right nav and selecting SAS Communities Library at the bottom of the list. In the Labels box in the right nav, click Analytics U:

Click Analytics U, then select "Subscribe" from the Options menu.

Happy Learning!

Contributors