I like the idea very much, but it raises many questions.
Even if only a free exchange model is considered -and the heavy matters of payment and liability are therefore avoided- many other issues arise. For example:
1. What will go there? Macros? Custom functions? Formats?
2. Should there be a set template of some sort for the contributions, in an attempt to give homogeneity, and to make using the contributions easier?
3. How to manage forks, when successive or improved or alternative versions are offered?
4. Many macro developers have a macro library that they call upon when they write new macros macros. This would present challenges in an App Store-type repository.
5. How much management should there be? While a fully open exchange place is theoretically desirable, it will most likely quickly lead to a chaos of contributions of varying interest and quality. This may be a good thing. Or not.
6. Should donations be possible (good luck!) with links to Paypal or virtual currency wallets?
Just writing my thoughts as they come. What are yours?
According to SAS Technical Support, the PSS application was replaced by a set of tasks in SAS Studio 3.6, but does not include the Narratives (described near the bottom of this page: https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63962/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_clientpss_s...).
Narratives made it very easy to generate a sensible, accurate report. Please bring this option back!
i am not sure how useful it would be, but i've tried to look through the SAS Communities posts in my 'downtime' while taxing (not while actually driving) my kids about town for their various activities and found that the content does not render very well on my iphone 6 using chrome. anyhow, i feel i might be more inclined to follow through conversations and offer insight in my off hours with an app designed to interface with this site.
I know admins will want to avoid creating too many forums/sub-forums but it seems to me that there might be a place for somewhere users could contribute SAS Studio Custom Tasks where it would be easy for people to find them. At the moment all we can do is place them in the General SAS Communities Library where, after a week or two, they'll get lost on page 5 or 6. I know I'd be up for writing some to get the ball rolling if that were created.
Of course there's also the excellent Custom Task Tuesday examples on GitHub https://github.com/sassoftware/sas-studio-tasks/tree/master/contributed/tasktuesdays but one issue SAS University Edition Students will find is that they can't use the repository as you need to use an https address which of course isn't supported in UE so another suggestion is to possibly make that clear on the GitHub page...
Take for example the following statement from the HHMMw.d Format documentation:
The HHMM format uses asterisks to format values that are outside the time range 0–24 hours, such as datetime values.
The same statement appears in the MMSSw.d Format documentation. It is not true, these formats are not limited to 24 hours worth of hours or minutes, respectively.
I wish there was a community on the forum to report and discuss such inaccuracies.
I suggest to add an additional community in the SAS Programming section that deals with the macro language/facility.
There are many posts/answers regarding this topic that would be easier to find.
On visiting my profile recently I notice the "Autosaved Drafts" and thought I would poke around a bit.
I found out that those drafts, as of May 4 2017 go back to May of 2016. I manually deleted them for a couple months worth but decided that maybe there should be profile setting to set how long to keep such things. I have had zero, none, nadda, reasons to recover draft post text going back more than one or two weeks.
Perhaps removing some of this might free up disk or memory for forum performance.
I did spend a little time poking around the profile options in case I had missed a feature for controlling the duration such things were saved but did not find one.
Note that I see this was just autosaved. I likely wont need to reference that autosave after I post this.
Visual Analytics is different enough from SAS language that it may be better if it's moved to a different forum like JMP.
GUI tools need a different type of forum (see Tableau's) and this style won't work in the long run, IMO.
I may be feeling grumpy this morning but how about an topic on the board that is something like "MY DATA STARTED IN EXCEL" and move every post that mentions Excel or has an xlsx attachment to that topic with a script.
It seems like a vast majority of errors or data issues arise from importing data from Excel regardless of the topic the question is posted to.
Or perhaps in the Stop right there section have a "If you data started in Excel click here <link> " to post it in that area.
I may be optimistic that some of users may actually read other posts about the exact same issue if they see their thread among others that look the same.
Rant mode <off>.
Is there a way for a community user to unsubscribe to a particular thread within a community that they subscribe to? If not, it sure would be useful!
For example, I am subscribed to the SAS/GRAPH and ODS Graphics community and I get email notification for every post and response in that group.
However, I am not interested in maps. If there is a long and detailed discussion about maps, I would like the option to NOT receive email for that particular thread, while still receiving email notification about other threads.
I noticed in my profile that I can stop receiving notifications for topics that I have replied to, so one option would seem to be "reply to the thread, then edit my profile to stop receiving notifications about it." However, that solution doesn't seem optimal!
Currently the forum will not allow a file with an RTF extension to upload. Since ODS RTF and ODS TAGSETS.RTF generate output and we do not have actual native DOCX output for many users it seems odd that people with RTF related questions cannot post actual results.
Work arounds of saving the file to DOCX destroy the actual output. Renaming the file with an extension of DOC or DOCX may have issues around the default program that opens the files (Microsoft applications "complaining" about mismatched extensions).
I often see webinar and other date-related announcements listed in the valuable "unsolved" screen space, even after the date is long gone. On a couple of occasions I've asked the poster (usually a SAS staffer) to remove or mark the post as solved - always graciously accomodated.
If a forum topic could be initially posted with an expiration date, that would be great.
The default expiration could be never, as it effectively is now. Or the community could have some other time period set to mark the topic as "read-only" as Rick W suggested, solving a related problem (re-awakening zombie topics).
As a non native English speaker (writer), I frequently use the spell check functionality.
It's a bit annoying that frequent used abbreviations and SAS code elements are marked as misspelled. These include (definitively not limited to): SAS, SQL, DATASETS, INTNX...
As a start, perhaps it's possible not to spell check fully upper case words?
I just did a survey about the SAS Communities and it didn't fit how I use it. At all.
It seemed to assume that the respondent was trying to solve a problem. I come to SAS Communities to learn new things about using SAS. Occassionally, I even have an idea to share. I ended up answering most of the questions with 'other.'
The caffiene stream may be getting too thin but a recent "thank you" for a solution triggered this (probably impractical) idea:
A $ or similar with a way to enter a value
the meaning being something like "This solution is worth $xxxx "
I would like to suggest 2 adjustments to the "Find a Community" menu:
Not sure if this has been asked before, currently if a poster responds to an earlier post then it gets inserted after that post. This can lead to confusing posts talking about other posts which are further down the chain. It would be nice to see an indeted, or tree like structure to the posts, maybe even including some form of collapsing/expanding of discussion branches. For example:
Main post here
Reply to main post
Reply to reply to post
Reply to main post
Main post here
-> Reply to main post
-> Reply to reply to post
-> Reply to man post
In my mind, isn't the SAS Studio forum a bit misplaced?
SAS Studio is an application, in which you can perform programming tasks. But this is true for many other SAS products.Questions in this forum should ideally be about how to use the application. Non SAS Studio specific programming tasks should be posted on the other programming forums.
And its Windows based cousin Enterprise Guide resides under BI, isn't that a more suitable place?