BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
Jessicalm0
Calcite | Level 5

I run a three-level nested model as following,

  • repeated measures of individual, and individual nested within couples
  • IV and DV are both binary variables, moderator Pcsc is continuous variable (centered)

And I would like to call for the simple slope and intercept estimates like what people can do in PROC MIXED Estimate statement, by assigning values of M-SD and M+SD to the moderator, following,

proc nlmixed  qpoints=20 tech=newrap;
eta = a0+a1*Propartner_lagged+a2*Pcsc++a3*Pcsc*Propartner_lagged+PE+CE;
mu = exp(eta) / (1+exp(eta));
model propartner_dummy ~ binary (mu);
random CE ~ Normal (0, sc) subject = couple_Id;
random PE ~ Normal (0, sp) subject = id (couple_Id);
estimate 'PreviousBeh effect at low Pcs' Pcsc=7.52 Pcsc*Propartner_lagged=7.52;
estimate 'PreviousBeh effect at high Pcs' Pcsc=9.74 Pcsc*Propartner_lagged=9.74;
run;

However, the programme report error as followings,

Log.JPG

Is it because of the logit link transformation in proc nlmixed? Then how to do the simple slope analysis to interprect the interaction? I'm quite new at handing multilevel modeling, please help me 🙂

 

PS I'm using SAS/STAT 13.2 because I need multiple RANDOM statements to model the three levels.

 

Thanks a lot!


error.JPG
1 REPLY 1

sas-innovate-2024.png

Join us for SAS Innovate April 16-19 at the Aria in Las Vegas. Bring the team and save big with our group pricing for a limited time only.

Pre-conference courses and tutorials are filling up fast and are always a sellout. Register today to reserve your seat.

 

Register now!

How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Click image to register for webinarClick image to register for webinar

Classroom Training Available!

Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for:

View all other training opportunities.

Discussion stats
  • 1 reply
  • 814 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation