BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
Solomon
Calcite | Level 5

Does anyone have a SAS Macro for chained equipercentile and frequency estimation equipercentile equating methods?

I would appreciate any help.

Thanks

Solomon

5 REPLIES 5
Solomon
Calcite | Level 5

Thank you Mohamed, I have this article which was slightly useful for the linear equating methods I am studying. Frequency estimation and chained equipercentile equating methods are non-linear and they function differently.

Solomon

art297
Opal | Level 21

Out of my area, but came across the following article that may be of help: http://analytics.ncsu.edu/sesug/2013/BtB-11.pdf

Solomon
Calcite | Level 5

Thank you Arthur, I have this article and another one presented at SESUG 2013 which were quite useful for Tucker, Levine, linear, and mean methods. I am struggling with the two non linear methods: Frequency estimation and chained equipercentile equating methods.

thanks again and happy new year

solomon

art297
Opal | Level 21

If you haven't looked at the following, as well, it also appears to contain some useful info, but all of the code is in R: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/equate/vignettes/equatevignette.pdf

sas-innovate-2024.png

Don't miss out on SAS Innovate - Register now for the FREE Livestream!

Can't make it to Vegas? No problem! Watch our general sessions LIVE or on-demand starting April 17th. Hear from SAS execs, best-selling author Adam Grant, Hot Ones host Sean Evans, top tech journalist Kara Swisher, AI expert Cassie Kozyrkov, and the mind-blowing dance crew iLuminate! Plus, get access to over 20 breakout sessions.

 

Register now!

How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Click image to register for webinarClick image to register for webinar

Classroom Training Available!

Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for:

View all other training opportunities.

Discussion stats
  • 5 replies
  • 1896 views
  • 6 likes
  • 3 in conversation