BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
rfarmenta
Obsidian | Level 7

I have 20 datasets each with 200,000 rows and anywhere from 30-70 columns. I can use a data step to merge the files by ID but is there a more efficient way to do this? I tried to merge using a left outer join in Proc SQL but that keeps giving me errors. Any suggestion sare appreciated.

 

 

3 REPLIES 3
Reeza
Super User

Are you looking for efficiency in terms of computer processing or in terms of minimum programming?

rfarmenta
Obsidian | Level 7

A combo of both but more important I think is programming since we don't have to complete the merge many times. Thank you!

ballardw
Super User

You should show code and the errors from the log. Best is to post the copied log/ error message into a code box opened with the forum {i} menu icon to preserve the formatting of the error messages. Many error messages have indicators as to where on a line the error occurs and the main message windows reformat log results.

 

IF any of the error relate to mismatched variable types, or different lengths of character, then you regardless of approach you will need to address that before attempting to merge the data.

 

 

sas-innovate-2024.png

Don't miss out on SAS Innovate - Register now for the FREE Livestream!

Can't make it to Vegas? No problem! Watch our general sessions LIVE or on-demand starting April 17th. Hear from SAS execs, best-selling author Adam Grant, Hot Ones host Sean Evans, top tech journalist Kara Swisher, AI expert Cassie Kozyrkov, and the mind-blowing dance crew iLuminate! Plus, get access to over 20 breakout sessions.

 

Register now!

How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Click image to register for webinarClick image to register for webinar

Classroom Training Available!

Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for:

View all other training opportunities.

Discussion stats
  • 3 replies
  • 1331 views
  • 0 likes
  • 3 in conversation