<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>AvinashRdy Tracker</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/kntur85557/tracker</link>
    <description>AvinashRdy Tracker</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 01:50:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-05-24T01:50:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What are the implications of using MFR binning instead of RFM binning?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/What-are-the-implications-of-using-MFR-binning-instead-of-RFM/m-p/210583#M2941</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the response. This is very helpful for my research &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://communities.sas.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:39:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/What-are-the-implications-of-using-MFR-binning-instead-of-RFM/m-p/210583#M2941</guid>
      <dc:creator>AvinashRdy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-30T16:39:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What are the implications of using MFR binning instead of RFM binning?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/What-are-the-implications-of-using-MFR-binning-instead-of-RFM/m-p/210581#M2939</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm dealing with data from a hotel where customers visit occasionally. Here, the recency wouldn't be much higher compared to any retail store. Hence, we decided to go with binning the data starting with Monetary value first, then binning Frequency finally binning Recency. The final index would be MFR index rather than RFM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please suggest / comment on using MFR instead of RFM in this scenario. mi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Avinash&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:05:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/What-are-the-implications-of-using-MFR-binning-instead-of-RFM/m-p/210581#M2939</guid>
      <dc:creator>AvinashRdy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-25T22:05:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Please provide suggestion for RFM using SAS EG for extremely skewed distribution.</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Please-provide-suggestion-for-RFM-using-SAS-EG-for-extremely/m-p/208643#M2843</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Ray for your clear explanation. I believe this is a very good starting point. I'll start experimenting with the number of bins.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Avinash&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:48:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Please-provide-suggestion-for-RFM-using-SAS-EG-for-extremely/m-p/208643#M2843</guid>
      <dc:creator>AvinashRdy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-24T16:48:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Please provide suggestion for RFM using SAS EG for extremely skewed distribution.</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Please-provide-suggestion-for-RFM-using-SAS-EG-for-extremely/m-p/208641#M2841</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Xia Keshan / Ray Wright,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your response. Unfortunately, I've SAS EG 5.1 which doesn't have the option to perform RFM scores directly. Can you suggest any other way to do this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:16:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Please-provide-suggestion-for-RFM-using-SAS-EG-for-extremely/m-p/208641#M2841</guid>
      <dc:creator>AvinashRdy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-24T16:16:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Please provide suggestion for RFM using SAS EG for extremely skewed distribution.</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Please-provide-suggestion-for-RFM-using-SAS-EG-for-extremely/m-p/208638#M2838</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've a customer data set with approximately 5 million records and data is collected based on customers from past 10 to 15 years. My target is divide the customers into RFM bins. All the recency, frequency and monitory value variables are extremely skewed. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, if I consider recency there are about 60-70% of the customers with recency 1 &amp;amp; 5-10% with recency between 2 to 5 &amp;amp; 2% between 5 to 10 so on..also about 0.1% above 100. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Similar case with monetory value. The monetary varies from 0 to 10,000,000 there are &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;about 30% of the customers who spent &amp;lt; $5 &amp;amp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;about 20% of the customers who spent between 5 to &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;10 &amp;amp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;30% b/w 10 to 100 &amp;amp; 20% between 100 to 1000 &amp;amp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;with 10% b/w 100 and 10,000 and &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;8% b/w 10,000 to 100,000 and so on...about 0.01% &amp;gt; 1,000,000&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;Similar scenario with Recency variable.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;I need to decide how the split should be done. &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;I've access to SAS EG. &lt;/SPAN&gt;Any idea or solution is much appreciated. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;Thank you so much in advance for your time.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;- Avinash&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2015 03:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Data-Science/Please-provide-suggestion-for-RFM-using-SAS-EG-for-extremely/m-p/208638#M2838</guid>
      <dc:creator>AvinashRdy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-24T03:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

