<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>zilok Tracker</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/kntur85557/tracker</link>
    <description>zilok Tracker</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 16:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-05-25T16:27:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re: weight of evidence for character variables</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/weight-of-evidence-for-character-variables/m-p/126356#M6646</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would suggest to create proc format dynamically. Please read proc format into plain text and use %include.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know this is not the to_the_point solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 04:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/weight-of-evidence-for-character-variables/m-p/126356#M6646</guid>
      <dc:creator>zilok</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-21T04:01:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can we use proc univariate for getting a clue on group cut off lines</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Can-we-use-proc-univariate-for-getting-a-clue-on-group-cut-off/m-p/104654#M5522</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can use proc univariate to create 20 groups/10 equal groups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One way is to use proc rank with groups=10 option&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAS Code:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc rank data = have groups = 10 out = out1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;var income;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ranks predgroup;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here out1 will have rank variable taking values 0 to 9. 10 equal groups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another way is to use proc univariate with output statement;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAS Code:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc univariate data = have;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;var income;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;output out=out1 pctlpts = 10 to 100 by 10 pctlpre = inc;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This gives you 10%,20%...90% &amp;amp; 100% percentile points.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can create proc format to create formats which can be easily used over the course of diff programs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are some advantages in using proc univariate:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Weight option is available in proc univariate(not available in proc rank)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. You dont have to create the whole dataset again. It is simple&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;zilok&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:22:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Can-we-use-proc-univariate-for-getting-a-clue-on-group-cut-off/m-p/104654#M5522</guid>
      <dc:creator>zilok</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-12T03:22:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: When to use %IF and IF in Macros?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/When-to-use-IF-and-IF-in-Macros/m-p/104980#M29331</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;IF is used inside a datastep. %IF is used in open code. You can always use %IF instead of IF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/When-to-use-IF-and-IF-in-Macros/m-p/104980#M29331</guid>
      <dc:creator>zilok</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-12T03:12:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there any more clever way to do it?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Is-there-any-more-clever-way-to-do-it/m-p/16592#M3069</link>
      <description>DATA work.check;&lt;BR /&gt;
SET work.test;&lt;BR /&gt;
FORMAT a valuefmt.;&lt;BR /&gt;
FORMAT b valuefmt.;&lt;BR /&gt;
RUN;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 00:01:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Is-there-any-more-clever-way-to-do-it/m-p/16592#M3069</guid>
      <dc:creator>zilok</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-19T00:01:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: compare colums to create new coloum</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/compare-colums-to-create-new-coloum/m-p/16704#M2354</link>
      <description>If this is your objective, a simple solution is to reverse sort the data and do the following:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
format date1 ddmmyyyy10.;&lt;BR /&gt;
if id = lag(id) then date1 = lag(date);&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
and sort back the data to its original form.&lt;BR /&gt;
Use _N_ to reverse sort the data.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
zilok</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/compare-colums-to-create-new-coloum/m-p/16704#M2354</guid>
      <dc:creator>zilok</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-18T23:54:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

