<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Model Statement in Proc Logistic in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Model-Statement-in-Proc-Logistic/m-p/188233#M9817</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. No. The asterisk is used to denote interaction terms rather than a single term. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. The bars | separating the variables tell SAS to consider interaction between those variables, but the @1 says to only consider single level so no interaction. If it was @2 then it would consider all 2 level interactions (Gender*Age Gender*Region Age*Region etc) between the variables.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. I don't think they're equivalent.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-18T18:41:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Model Statement in Proc Logistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Model-Statement-in-Proc-Logistic/m-p/188232#M9816</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question regarding the model statement syntax in proc logistic. I read that the below two model statements are equivalent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Mode1 Purchase * Gender Age Region;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Mode1 Purchase * Gender|Age|Region @1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have never seen such model statements ever before. My questions are&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Can we use asterisk to separate the dependent from independent variables? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. What is the @1 doing in the 2nd option above?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. How are these two statements equivalent?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:38:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Model-Statement-in-Proc-Logistic/m-p/188232#M9816</guid>
      <dc:creator>msdinesh87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-18T16:38:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Model Statement in Proc Logistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Model-Statement-in-Proc-Logistic/m-p/188233#M9817</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. No. The asterisk is used to denote interaction terms rather than a single term. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. The bars | separating the variables tell SAS to consider interaction between those variables, but the @1 says to only consider single level so no interaction. If it was @2 then it would consider all 2 level interactions (Gender*Age Gender*Region Age*Region etc) between the variables.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. I don't think they're equivalent.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Model-Statement-in-Proc-Logistic/m-p/188233#M9817</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-18T18:41:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

