<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Proc SurveyPhreg and stepwise selection? in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-SurveyPhreg-and-stepwise-selection/m-p/184456#M9568</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to do automated stepwise selection for Proc SurveyPhreg? I see it's possible for Proc phreg, but the same command does not work with Proc SurveyPhreg.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>liz_m</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-26T19:46:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc SurveyPhreg and stepwise selection?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-SurveyPhreg-and-stepwise-selection/m-p/184456#M9568</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to do automated stepwise selection for Proc SurveyPhreg? I see it's possible for Proc phreg, but the same command does not work with Proc SurveyPhreg.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-SurveyPhreg-and-stepwise-selection/m-p/184456#M9568</guid>
      <dc:creator>liz_m</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-26T19:46:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc SurveyPhreg and stepwise selection?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-SurveyPhreg-and-stepwise-selection/m-p/184457#M9569</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably not available.&amp;nbsp; While you look for a work-around be sure to look at:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.nesug.org/proceedings/nesug07/sa/sa07.pdf"&gt;http://www.nesug.org/proceedings/nesug07/sa/sa07.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Stopping stepwise: Why stepwise and similar selection methods are bad, and what you should use&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter L. Flom, National Development and Research Institutes, New York, NY David L. Cassell, Design Pathways, Corvallis, OR&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another to look at would be:Frank Harrell's excellent text: &lt;EM&gt;Regression Modeling Strategies with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression and Survival Analysis.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:42:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-SurveyPhreg-and-stepwise-selection/m-p/184457#M9569</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-27T16:42:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

