<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC GAM: Additive suboption with class statement in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GAM-Additive-suboption-with-class-statement/m-p/178615#M9261</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When model only included continuous variable, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;estimates of additive component in the data from ods output SmoothingComponentPlot were like left table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the other hand, when model&amp;nbsp; include categorical variable,&amp;nbsp; estimates were like right table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="7978" alt="cont.PNG" class="jive-image" src="https://communities.sas.com/legacyfs/online/7978_cont.PNG" /&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="7979" alt="cat.PNG" class="jive-image" height="155" src="https://communities.sas.com/legacyfs/online/7979_cat.PNG" width="94" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 01:22:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yasyuki_k</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-11-21T01:22:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC GAM: Additive suboption with class statement</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GAM-Additive-suboption-with-class-statement/m-p/178613#M9259</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, experts!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need your help about GAM procedure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I use the ADDITIVE suboption with class statement to get the additive component plots, estimates for the plots aren't reasonable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any solution?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc gam data=dataset plots=component(&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;additive&lt;/SPAN&gt;);&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;class x0&lt;/SPAN&gt;;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; model&amp;nbsp; y= &lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;param(x0)&lt;/SPAN&gt; spline(x1) spline(x2) / link=Identity&amp;nbsp; dist=normal method=GCV;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 04:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GAM-Additive-suboption-with-class-statement/m-p/178613#M9259</guid>
      <dc:creator>yasyuki_k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-20T04:15:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC GAM: Additive suboption with class statement</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GAM-Additive-suboption-with-class-statement/m-p/178614#M9260</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you mean that the plots aren't reasonable?&amp;nbsp; Can you give an example of what happens, and what you would expect?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:27:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GAM-Additive-suboption-with-class-statement/m-p/178614#M9260</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-20T19:27:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC GAM: Additive suboption with class statement</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GAM-Additive-suboption-with-class-statement/m-p/178615#M9261</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When model only included continuous variable, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;estimates of additive component in the data from ods output SmoothingComponentPlot were like left table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the other hand, when model&amp;nbsp; include categorical variable,&amp;nbsp; estimates were like right table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="7978" alt="cont.PNG" class="jive-image" src="https://communities.sas.com/legacyfs/online/7978_cont.PNG" /&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="7979" alt="cat.PNG" class="jive-image" height="155" src="https://communities.sas.com/legacyfs/online/7979_cat.PNG" width="94" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 01:22:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GAM-Additive-suboption-with-class-statement/m-p/178615#M9261</guid>
      <dc:creator>yasyuki_k</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-21T01:22:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC GAM: Additive suboption with class statement</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GAM-Additive-suboption-with-class-statement/m-p/178616#M9262</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears that the right hand column is giving the difference from the reference level of x0, which in the default case would be the last level.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps you could add the value of the last level (or its mean/median if the class collapses several values) to get values more like those on the left.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GAM-Additive-suboption-with-class-statement/m-p/178616#M9262</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-21T13:37:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

