<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Stratification vs. Adjustment in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Stratification-vs-Adjustment/m-p/175990#M9097</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is more of a general statistical question rather than SAS specific.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We run a lot of survival curves on clinical trial data, and we get hazard ratios to accompany those curves.&amp;nbsp; When we make no changes to the data, we get an unadjusted hazard ratio.&amp;nbsp; I have been asked to run stratified and adjusted hazard ratios as well.&amp;nbsp; I know how to code these in SAS, but I have a hard time explaining them.&amp;nbsp; I have asked others in the company, but I'm not getting too far.&amp;nbsp; Can someone clearly explain the difference between stratified and adjusted?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe stratified is running a bunch of hazard ratios based on different strata (e.g., race, gender, etc.).&amp;nbsp; Then SAS pools those to give a more precise hazard ratio than the unadjusted hazard ratio.&amp;nbsp; Is that correct?&amp;nbsp; If so, great, but I have no idea how to explain adjusted analyses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 21:03:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>djbateman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-28T21:03:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stratification vs. Adjustment</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Stratification-vs-Adjustment/m-p/175990#M9097</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is more of a general statistical question rather than SAS specific.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We run a lot of survival curves on clinical trial data, and we get hazard ratios to accompany those curves.&amp;nbsp; When we make no changes to the data, we get an unadjusted hazard ratio.&amp;nbsp; I have been asked to run stratified and adjusted hazard ratios as well.&amp;nbsp; I know how to code these in SAS, but I have a hard time explaining them.&amp;nbsp; I have asked others in the company, but I'm not getting too far.&amp;nbsp; Can someone clearly explain the difference between stratified and adjusted?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe stratified is running a bunch of hazard ratios based on different strata (e.g., race, gender, etc.).&amp;nbsp; Then SAS pools those to give a more precise hazard ratio than the unadjusted hazard ratio.&amp;nbsp; Is that correct?&amp;nbsp; If so, great, but I have no idea how to explain adjusted analyses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2014 21:03:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Stratification-vs-Adjustment/m-p/175990#M9097</guid>
      <dc:creator>djbateman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-28T21:03:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

