<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC GLIMMIX Issue with Residuals in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-Issue-with-Residuals/m-p/25251#M891</link>
    <description>See my response to your duplicate post in SAS Procedures.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lvm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-10T16:31:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC GLIMMIX Issue with Residuals</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-Issue-with-Residuals/m-p/25250#M890</link>
      <description>Hi, my name is Andy and I'm analyzing a large dataset using SAS Proc Glimmix&lt;BR /&gt;
procedure. My dataset contains over 20,000 GPS records. I'm trying to&lt;BR /&gt;
evaluate why certain deer were observed during hunting season thus I've coded&lt;BR /&gt;
the deer that were observed with a "1" and those not observed with a "0." I&lt;BR /&gt;
coded the entire our that the deer was observed to encompass any hunter&lt;BR /&gt;
recording errors. My model is shown below: &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
PROC GLIMMIX DATA=OBS METHOD=LAPLACE;&lt;BR /&gt;
CLASS ID YEAR EXPOSURE HABITAT_VALUE;&lt;BR /&gt;
MODEL OBSERVED (EVENT = '1') = EXPOSURE STEPLENGTH HABITAT_VALUE ELEVATION&lt;BR /&gt;
DIST_NEAREST_ROAD / DIST=BINARY LINK=LOGIT SOLUTION;&lt;BR /&gt;
RANDOM ID YEAR;&lt;BR /&gt;
RUN;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I want to see if the different independent variables influence the&lt;BR /&gt;
observation of deer throughout the hunting season. My question is what are&lt;BR /&gt;
the assumptions that I need to adhere to with logistic regression. I read&lt;BR /&gt;
that the data does not need to be normally distributed. I know "steplength"&lt;BR /&gt;
is extremely right skewed with the mean of 48 meters and a max value of 1,400&lt;BR /&gt;
meters. If normality is not an issue then I assumed the next step would be to&lt;BR /&gt;
at least examine the residuals and remove some of those extreme movements. I&lt;BR /&gt;
added the PLOT=RESIDUALPANEL option to my model with ODS GRAPHICS and plotted&lt;BR /&gt;
the residuals. The residuals looked very different than what I'd see in a&lt;BR /&gt;
PROC MIXED model and I was unable to interpret the plots to determine if I&lt;BR /&gt;
need to remove any outliers. Will I not receive a normal residual plot,&lt;BR /&gt;
similar to PROC MIXED? If so, how do you interpret residual plots from PROC&lt;BR /&gt;
GLIMMIX. Thank you very much!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:18:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-Issue-with-Residuals/m-p/25250#M890</guid>
      <dc:creator>Buck1480</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-09T16:18:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC GLIMMIX Issue with Residuals</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-Issue-with-Residuals/m-p/25251#M891</link>
      <description>See my response to your duplicate post in SAS Procedures.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-GLIMMIX-Issue-with-Residuals/m-p/25251#M891</guid>
      <dc:creator>lvm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-10T16:31:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

