<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Analyzing zero-inflated near-normally distributed data in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analyzing-zero-inflated-near-normally-distributed-data/m-p/166342#M8692</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the response you are looking at the difference between timepoint A and timepoint B (these might be intervals of equal length)?&amp;nbsp; If so, rather than looking at differences, could you treat the values as repeated measures, and then look at the difference in the least squares means.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason I suggest this is because I think an observation of 3 days for A and 3 days for B resulting in a zero is fundamentally different from an observation of 90 days for A and 90 days for B, which also results in a zero.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message was edited by: Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:03:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-31T18:03:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Analyzing zero-inflated near-normally distributed data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analyzing-zero-inflated-near-normally-distributed-data/m-p/166340#M8690</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an outcome variable measuring change of numbers of unhealthy days across two time points. The data is highly zero-inflated with both negative and positive numbers . Does anyone know how to transform the data to make it normally distributed? Ideally I want to use linear regression model but there might be other models which deal better with non-parametric data like this. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please feel free to throw in any ideas!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 03:55:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analyzing-zero-inflated-near-normally-distributed-data/m-p/166340#M8690</guid>
      <dc:creator>cindyforest7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-31T03:55:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analyzing zero-inflated near-normally distributed data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analyzing-zero-inflated-near-normally-distributed-data/m-p/166341#M8691</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.6000003814697px;"&gt;You should look at the FMM procedure. Start with the introductory zero-inflation example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.6000003814697px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.6000003814697px;"&gt;&lt;A class="active_link" href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/67523/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_fmm_gettingstarted02.htm" title="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/67523/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_fmm_gettingstarted02.htm"&gt;http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/67523/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_fmm_gettingstarted02.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.6000003814697px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="font-size: 13.6000003814697px;"&gt;PG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 05:02:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analyzing-zero-inflated-near-normally-distributed-data/m-p/166341#M8691</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-31T05:02:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analyzing zero-inflated near-normally distributed data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analyzing-zero-inflated-near-normally-distributed-data/m-p/166342#M8692</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the response you are looking at the difference between timepoint A and timepoint B (these might be intervals of equal length)?&amp;nbsp; If so, rather than looking at differences, could you treat the values as repeated measures, and then look at the difference in the least squares means.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason I suggest this is because I think an observation of 3 days for A and 3 days for B resulting in a zero is fundamentally different from an observation of 90 days for A and 90 days for B, which also results in a zero.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message was edited by: Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:03:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analyzing-zero-inflated-near-normally-distributed-data/m-p/166342#M8692</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-31T18:03:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

