<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC MIXED and &amp;quot;Tests of Hypotheses for Mixed Model Analysis of Variance&amp;quot; in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-and-quot-Tests-of-Hypotheses-for-Mixed-Model-Analysis/m-p/163594#M8541</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot Funda and Steve for your answers!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 07:51:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AnalytX</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-07T07:51:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC MIXED and "Tests of Hypotheses for Mixed Model Analysis of Variance"</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-and-quot-Tests-of-Hypotheses-for-Mixed-Model-Analysis/m-p/163591#M8538</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can we obtain using PROC MIXED the "Tests of Hypotheses for Mixed Model Analysis of Variance" table like the one which is obtained using PROC GLM (TEST option in RANDOM statement)? We have by default only the "Type 3 Tests of Fixed Effects".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanking you in advance for your answers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:16:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-and-quot-Tests-of-Hypotheses-for-Mixed-Model-Analysis/m-p/163591#M8538</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnalytX</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-02T10:16:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC MIXED and "Tests of Hypotheses for Mixed Model Analysis of Variance"</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-and-quot-Tests-of-Hypotheses-for-Mixed-Model-Analysis/m-p/163592#M8539</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To get variance component estimates use COVTEST option of the PROC MIXED statement: &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/66859/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_mixed_syntax01.htm" title="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/66859/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_mixed_syntax01.htm"&gt;SAS/STAT(R) 13.1 User's Guide&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc mixed data=yourdata covtest;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note that COVTEST option produces the&lt;STRONG&gt; asymptotic &lt;/STRONG&gt;standard errors and Wald Z-tests for the covariance parameter estimates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this woud be helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Funda&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-and-quot-Tests-of-Hypotheses-for-Mixed-Model-Analysis/m-p/163592#M8539</guid>
      <dc:creator>Funda_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-02T18:24:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC MIXED and "Tests of Hypotheses for Mixed Model Analysis of Variance"</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-and-quot-Tests-of-Hypotheses-for-Mixed-Model-Analysis/m-p/163593#M8540</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You cannot get tests like those as GLM depends on partitioning sums of squares and expected mean squares for its tests using random effects.&amp;nbsp; MIXED uses a (RE)ML method to construct quadratic forms that depend on maximizing the likelihood of the observed values, given the fixed effects of the model and conditional on the random effect estimates. &lt;A __default_attr="3477" __jive_macro_name="user" class="jive_macro jive_macro_user" data-objecttype="3" href="https://communities.sas.com/"&gt;&lt;/A&gt; 's response will help if you are interested in the covariance parameter estimates only.&amp;nbsp; The Wald tests of significance for the parameters are woefully inadequate in most cases due to lack of sample size.&amp;nbsp; If you have sufficient data, using PROC GLIMMIX with Gauss-Hermitian quadrature methods will improve the accuracy of the estimates and the (still) asymptotic errors.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 18:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-and-quot-Tests-of-Hypotheses-for-Mixed-Model-Analysis/m-p/163593#M8540</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-02T18:39:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC MIXED and "Tests of Hypotheses for Mixed Model Analysis of Variance"</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-and-quot-Tests-of-Hypotheses-for-Mixed-Model-Analysis/m-p/163594#M8541</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot Funda and Steve for your answers!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 07:51:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-and-quot-Tests-of-Hypotheses-for-Mixed-Model-Analysis/m-p/163594#M8541</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnalytX</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-07T07:51:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

