<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple comparison tests that account for correlation between linear combinations in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Multiple-comparison-tests-that-account-for-correlation-between/m-p/159812#M8309</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can using multiple comparison procedures that accommodate for correlation between linear combinations (such as MaxT, MinP, Tukey etc) be used to control the FWE for any set of non-orthogonal contrasts? That is to say, could I construct a contrast-matrix involving any set of non-orthogonal vectors with overlapping information and still be sure that FWE is controlled and that the interpretation is valid? (Given that the contrast had a valid interpretation to begin with...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 14:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-15T14:17:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple comparison tests that account for correlation between linear combinations</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Multiple-comparison-tests-that-account-for-correlation-between/m-p/159812#M8309</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can using multiple comparison procedures that accommodate for correlation between linear combinations (such as MaxT, MinP, Tukey etc) be used to control the FWE for any set of non-orthogonal contrasts? That is to say, could I construct a contrast-matrix involving any set of non-orthogonal vectors with overlapping information and still be sure that FWE is controlled and that the interpretation is valid? (Given that the contrast had a valid interpretation to begin with...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 14:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Multiple-comparison-tests-that-account-for-correlation-between/m-p/159812#M8309</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-15T14:17:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple comparison tests that account for correlation between linear combinations</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Multiple-comparison-tests-that-account-for-correlation-between/m-p/159813#M8310</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe the MinP method would cover this (see page 285--288 in Westfall et al., Mutiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using SAS, 2nd ed.).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 18:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Multiple-comparison-tests-that-account-for-correlation-between/m-p/159813#M8310</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-19T18:01:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

