<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Proc Phreg problem in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Phreg-problem/m-p/157722#M8236</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think your own answer is correct, namely that the samplesize is too low in some group. Though, since you did not include the interaction between HR and HTN I rather think it is the total "NO HTN" group that are too small.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, remember that you need to see some events in all groups, therefore it is relevant to count the number of events at each level for all variables. If there are some level with 0 events, then you can not estimate the hazard-ratio for that level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sometimes estimating becomes impossible even if there are events at all levels. Forexample if there are just one event at some level and that event happens at some time where there are no other at risk in any other levels - or if that event is the only event in some level for some other variable (a kind of coliniarity). Try therefore to make the 2X2 table you did, but weighted with number of events.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jacob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:33:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JacobSimonsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-11-05T20:33:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc Phreg problem</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Phreg-problem/m-p/157721#M8235</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing COX analysis, here is my syntax:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc phreg data=a;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class HR;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;model time*status(0)=sex HR age HTN / rl;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sex , HR, and HTN are binary variables, age is a continuous variable. the output of Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates showed below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Parameter&amp;nbsp; DF Hazard 95% Hazard Ratio Confidence&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ratio&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Limits&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HR&amp;nbsp; low&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 16.143&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5.8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 79.678 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;age&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.753&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.643&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.882 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sex&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.099&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.015&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.637 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTN&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5100&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; . &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why HTN has this kind of 95% hazard ratio confidence limits: 0, . ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is this related to small number of no HTN in HR low group? below is a 2X2 table:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; NO HTN HTN &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HRLOW 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 17 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HRhigh&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 51 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I solve this problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:45:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Phreg-problem/m-p/157721#M8235</guid>
      <dc:creator>xinjian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-05T15:45:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc Phreg problem</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Phreg-problem/m-p/157722#M8236</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think your own answer is correct, namely that the samplesize is too low in some group. Though, since you did not include the interaction between HR and HTN I rather think it is the total "NO HTN" group that are too small.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, remember that you need to see some events in all groups, therefore it is relevant to count the number of events at each level for all variables. If there are some level with 0 events, then you can not estimate the hazard-ratio for that level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sometimes estimating becomes impossible even if there are events at all levels. Forexample if there are just one event at some level and that event happens at some time where there are no other at risk in any other levels - or if that event is the only event in some level for some other variable (a kind of coliniarity). Try therefore to make the 2X2 table you did, but weighted with number of events.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jacob&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:33:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Phreg-problem/m-p/157722#M8236</guid>
      <dc:creator>JacobSimonsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-05T20:33:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

