<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Analysis Question in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22944#M757</link>
    <description>OK, so you've got something like this&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
2008   1    10&lt;BR /&gt;
2008   2    12&lt;BR /&gt;
2008   3    11&lt;BR /&gt;
2008   4    10&lt;BR /&gt;
2009   1      9&lt;BR /&gt;
2009   2    10&lt;BR /&gt;
2009   3    11&lt;BR /&gt;
2009   4    10&lt;BR /&gt;
2010    1    xxx&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
then you find that xxx = 12.  Is 12 "reasonable".&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is that your question?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If so, may I ask how many years of data you have, and whether there is reason to expect either a long term trend or seasonal variation or both?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Peter&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.statisticalanalysisconsulting.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.statisticalanalysisconsulting.com/&lt;/A&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>plf515</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-12T01:34:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Analysis Question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22942#M755</link>
      <description>Hi All:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Being a programmer, I'm no great shakes at statistics.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What I have is a measurement for each quarter for a year.  I have a value for the first quarter of the following year.  (I have YEAR, QUARTER, MEASURE)  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I would like to know whether the new quarter is "reasonable" given the values of past year (ie: should I reject that value and investigate).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Remember, I'm a programmer so the simpler the better!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks in advance.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:14:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22942#M755</guid>
      <dc:creator>OS2Rules</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-30T14:14:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analysis Question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22943#M756</link>
      <description>PROC COMPARE with suitable options to satisfy your "reasonable" check.  Or a DATA step process to compare related consecutive "period" values.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Scott Barry&lt;BR /&gt;
SBBWorks, Inc.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:17:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22943#M756</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-30T16:17:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analysis Question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22944#M757</link>
      <description>OK, so you've got something like this&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
2008   1    10&lt;BR /&gt;
2008   2    12&lt;BR /&gt;
2008   3    11&lt;BR /&gt;
2008   4    10&lt;BR /&gt;
2009   1      9&lt;BR /&gt;
2009   2    10&lt;BR /&gt;
2009   3    11&lt;BR /&gt;
2009   4    10&lt;BR /&gt;
2010    1    xxx&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
then you find that xxx = 12.  Is 12 "reasonable".&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is that your question?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If so, may I ask how many years of data you have, and whether there is reason to expect either a long term trend or seasonal variation or both?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Peter&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.statisticalanalysisconsulting.com/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.statisticalanalysisconsulting.com/&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22944#M757</guid>
      <dc:creator>plf515</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-12T01:34:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analysis Question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22945#M758</link>
      <description>That is exactly what I am looking for.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I only have 2 years of good data (8 quarters) which I know is a problem (not enough data!)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I would like to know that when xxx=12 it is "ok" and when xxx=345 is it not (or whatever) based on the previous set of data for that measure.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22945#M758</guid>
      <dc:creator>OS2Rules</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-16T18:57:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Analysis Question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22946#M759</link>
      <description>Sorry, but I don't think there is a good statistical answer for this.  You can get a distribution of quarter to quarter change, but there N will = 7, and that's not much to go on; esp. if there are seasonal patterns.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Instead, I think you have to substantively define what would be an unreasonable change.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:34:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Analysis-Question/m-p/22946#M759</guid>
      <dc:creator>plf515</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-17T02:34:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

