<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Inflating standard errors when using a standardized weight on survey data in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Inflating-standard-errors-when-using-a-standardized-weight-on/m-p/132495#M6908</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have a survey, use PROC SURVEYFREQ, not PROC FREQ.&amp;nbsp; The standard errors and the variances calculated in PROC FREQ do not account for the survey design (for example, stratification, clustering).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:28:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>1zmm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-13T12:28:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inflating standard errors when using a standardized weight on survey data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Inflating-standard-errors-when-using-a-standardized-weight-on/m-p/132494#M6907</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have calculated a standardized weight for running weighted analysis using PROC FREQ. The issue is, I obtain standard errors that are half the size of the standard errors I obtain when using all the survey parameters in PROC SURVEYFREQ. I calculate the same proportions when I use the standardized weight in PROC FREQ and the original weight in PROC SURVEYFREQ, but I have a larger standard error in PROC SURVEYFREQ than in PROC FREQ. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to figure out if there is a standard way to inflate the standard error so that it does not underestimate the variance estimates in PROC FREQ. Thank you for any guidance you can provide!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Inflating-standard-errors-when-using-a-standardized-weight-on/m-p/132494#M6907</guid>
      <dc:creator>HyunJee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-11T22:29:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inflating standard errors when using a standardized weight on survey data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Inflating-standard-errors-when-using-a-standardized-weight-on/m-p/132495#M6908</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have a survey, use PROC SURVEYFREQ, not PROC FREQ.&amp;nbsp; The standard errors and the variances calculated in PROC FREQ do not account for the survey design (for example, stratification, clustering).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:28:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Inflating-standard-errors-when-using-a-standardized-weight-on/m-p/132495#M6908</guid>
      <dc:creator>1zmm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-13T12:28:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

