<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Rate comparisons in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Rate-comparisons/m-p/21637#M676</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Doc Muhlbaier,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for spending some time to look at my post.&amp;nbsp; The same sample is measured over the various time points so it is not destructive. The repeats are done with replicate samples.&amp;nbsp; There are five conditions and four replicates of each sample measured over a five day period. The measurement is continuous and I am assuming normality, but I will try to look at that during data analysis. The sample size is limited though; having only four replicates of each condition so I am not sure how significant that test will be.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for you insight,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 11:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kvedvik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-02T11:44:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Rate comparisons</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Rate-comparisons/m-p/21635#M674</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have samples that I have treated with different conditions and want to know if these conditions have impacted the rate of change over time.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone have a suggestion for how best to do this comparison?&amp;nbsp; I have looked at the different rates in a bivariate plot to calculate the slope, but is there a way to calculate the slope and then compare them to each other with out all the manual transcription of numbers?&amp;nbsp; It would be nice to have confidence intervals around those slopes and see if a graphical representation how they overlap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Rate-comparisons/m-p/21635#M674</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvedvik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-30T19:06:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rate comparisons</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Rate-comparisons/m-p/21636#M675</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We need more information about your design to offer suggestions..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the samples measured repeatedly over time or is the measurement destructive (so each sample x time x condition is independent)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If repeated, are the repeats over time or over both time and condition?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are the units of the outcome meaure (binary, continuous)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If continuous, do you assume normality?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the sample size?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure what you mean by "manual transcription of numbers".&amp;nbsp; SAS is generally designed to work against the sample level data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Doc Muhlbaier&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Duke&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 01:02:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Rate-comparisons/m-p/21636#M675</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Duke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-02T01:02:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rate comparisons</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Rate-comparisons/m-p/21637#M676</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Doc Muhlbaier,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for spending some time to look at my post.&amp;nbsp; The same sample is measured over the various time points so it is not destructive. The repeats are done with replicate samples.&amp;nbsp; There are five conditions and four replicates of each sample measured over a five day period. The measurement is continuous and I am assuming normality, but I will try to look at that during data analysis. The sample size is limited though; having only four replicates of each condition so I am not sure how significant that test will be.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for you insight,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 11:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Rate-comparisons/m-p/21637#M676</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvedvik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-02T11:44:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

