<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic proc GENMOD vs GLM in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-GENMOD-vs-GLM/m-p/116519#M6117</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please explain why I'm getting different results when I ran this two procedures?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;title2 "Multiple linear regression using Proc Genmod categorical smoking covariate";&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc genmod data=included2 ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; weight MEC6YR;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; class smoker RIAGENDR RIDRETH1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; model LBDVID=smoker RIAGENDR RIDAGEYR RIDRETH1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;title2 "Multiple linear regression using Proc GLM categorical smoking covariate";&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glm data=included2 ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; weight MEC6YR;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; class smoker RIAGENDR RIDRETH1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; model LBDVID=smoker RIAGENDR RIDAGEYR RIDRETH1/ solution;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 17:09:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Polina_Utah</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-23T17:09:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>proc GENMOD vs GLM</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-GENMOD-vs-GLM/m-p/116519#M6117</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you please explain why I'm getting different results when I ran this two procedures?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;title2 "Multiple linear regression using Proc Genmod categorical smoking covariate";&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc genmod data=included2 ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; weight MEC6YR;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; class smoker RIAGENDR RIDRETH1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; model LBDVID=smoker RIAGENDR RIDAGEYR RIDRETH1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;title2 "Multiple linear regression using Proc GLM categorical smoking covariate";&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glm data=included2 ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; weight MEC6YR;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; class smoker RIAGENDR RIDRETH1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; model LBDVID=smoker RIAGENDR RIDAGEYR RIDRETH1/ solution;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 17:09:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-GENMOD-vs-GLM/m-p/116519#M6117</guid>
      <dc:creator>Polina_Utah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-23T17:09:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: proc GENMOD vs GLM</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-GENMOD-vs-GLM/m-p/116520#M6118</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;PROC GENMOD uses likelihood ratios rather than the sums of squares used in PROC GLM.&amp;nbsp; Specify in the MODEL statement of PROC GENMOD the options, WALD, TYPE3, and TYPE1.&amp;nbsp; The WEIGHT statements of the two procedures also perform different functions (cf., the documentation).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 21:52:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/proc-GENMOD-vs-GLM/m-p/116520#M6118</guid>
      <dc:creator>1zmm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-23T21:52:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

