<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Proc Mixed with random statement in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-with-random-statement/m-p/110840#M5860</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having an issue debating whether to include an interaction treatment in my random statement.&amp;nbsp; I ran an animal trial 3 times (due to lack of space for housing more animals).&amp;nbsp; So I had 3 repetitions of animals.&amp;nbsp; There were 3 treatments within each repetition and 5 animals per treatment.&amp;nbsp; So 15 total animals that we measure weight (and other things) weekly per repetition.&amp;nbsp; What I didn't expect was that each repetition is significantly different from each other.&amp;nbsp; So I included repetition as a random statement (along with repeated week/subject=animal).&amp;nbsp; Since the rep is different and the treatments are affected by rep, should I also include repetition*treatment within the random statement?&amp;nbsp; If I run rep*treatment within the model statement as a fixed effect, it is not significant.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight would be much appreciated....I'm very unsure as to what to do.&amp;nbsp; Thanks in advance to everyone for your time!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sylvia&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:32:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SylviaK</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-18T16:32:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc Mixed with random statement</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-with-random-statement/m-p/110840#M5860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having an issue debating whether to include an interaction treatment in my random statement.&amp;nbsp; I ran an animal trial 3 times (due to lack of space for housing more animals).&amp;nbsp; So I had 3 repetitions of animals.&amp;nbsp; There were 3 treatments within each repetition and 5 animals per treatment.&amp;nbsp; So 15 total animals that we measure weight (and other things) weekly per repetition.&amp;nbsp; What I didn't expect was that each repetition is significantly different from each other.&amp;nbsp; So I included repetition as a random statement (along with repeated week/subject=animal).&amp;nbsp; Since the rep is different and the treatments are affected by rep, should I also include repetition*treatment within the random statement?&amp;nbsp; If I run rep*treatment within the model statement as a fixed effect, it is not significant.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight would be much appreciated....I'm very unsure as to what to do.&amp;nbsp; Thanks in advance to everyone for your time!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sylvia&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:32:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-with-random-statement/m-p/110840#M5860</guid>
      <dc:creator>SylviaK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-18T16:32:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc Mixed with random statement</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-with-random-statement/m-p/110841#M5861</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would almost certainly include it as a random effect, if for no other reason than to get the denominator degrees of freedom more nearly correct.&amp;nbsp; Set up what Stroup refers to as a skeleton ANOVA table and check for degrees of freedom and sources of variability.&amp;nbsp; With a repeated measures design and a small dataset, I would also apply ddfm=kenwardrogers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See W.W. Stroup (2013) &lt;EM&gt;Generalized Linear Mixed Models.&lt;/EM&gt; CRC Press&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:40:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-with-random-statement/m-p/110841#M5861</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-18T16:40:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc Mixed with random statement</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-with-random-statement/m-p/110842#M5862</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks so much for your help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:37:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-with-random-statement/m-p/110842#M5862</guid>
      <dc:creator>SylviaK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-21T16:37:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

