<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question about estimate statement in GENMOD in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Question-about-estimate-statement-in-GENMOD/m-p/107728#M5708</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Steve!&amp;nbsp; I did as you suggested and abandoned the GEE analysis and used PROC MIXED instead.&amp;nbsp; The lsmestimate statements then worked great.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:17:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SEP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-01T14:17:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about estimate statement in GENMOD</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Question-about-estimate-statement-in-GENMOD/m-p/107726#M5706</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am working with a polynomial regression model using generalized estimating equations in GENMOD.&amp;nbsp; My goal in using the estimate statement is to compare treatment groups at various time point.&amp;nbsp; I am having problems getting the estimate statement to work with my reference treatment group at particular time points and I am not sure why.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The time points that I am using are 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, and 270.&amp;nbsp; The time variables are centered using a mean value of 165. time1 is the centered value of time, time2 is this value squared, and time3 is this value cubed.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I have 5 treatment groups and am trying to estimate the difference between two groups, one of which is the reference group in the model.&amp;nbsp; I tried to code the reference group as I did all other groups, but this did not work, so I set the reference group to zero.&amp;nbsp; The estimate statement produces the expected result for the first estimate statement but indicates that the second estimate statement is non-estimable.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc genmod data = diblong1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class treatment mouse_ID;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;model lngluc = treatment time1 time2 time3 treatment*time1 treatment*time2 treatment*time3/type3;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;repeated subject=mouse_ID / corr=EXCH corrw;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;estimate 'Diff tx1 vs. tx5 at time = 60'&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; treatment 1 0 0 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; treatment*time1 -105 0 0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; treatment*time2 11025 0 0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; treatment*time3 -1157625 0 0 0 0;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;estimate 'Diff tx1 vs. tx5 at time = 150'&amp;nbsp; treatment 1 0 0 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; treatment*time1 -15 0 0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; treatment*time2 225 0 0 0 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; treatment*time3 -3375 0 0 0 0;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Susan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Question-about-estimate-statement-in-GENMOD/m-p/107726#M5706</guid>
      <dc:creator>SEP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-26T13:58:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about estimate statement in GENMOD</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Question-about-estimate-statement-in-GENMOD/m-p/107727#M5707</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I honestly think that the first estimate statement, while estimable, is not giving you what you think you want.&amp;nbsp; If you are on v9.22 or higher, you should have access to the LSMESTIMATE statement, which would make this much easier to write.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;lsmestimate treatment 'Diff tx1 vs. tx5 at time = 60'&amp;nbsp; 1 0 0 0 -1/at (time1 time2 time3)=(-105 11025 -1157625);&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;lsmestimate treatment 'Diff tx1 vs. tx5 at time = 150'&amp;nbsp; 1 0 0 0 -1/at (time1 time2 time3)=(-15 225 -3375);&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, if you are bound to the use of the estimate statement, I recommend doing some first passes using the LSMEANS statement with the AT= and E options.&amp;nbsp; This will make it much more obvious what coefficients go into the estimate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also notice that your dependent variable is "lngluc" and that you do not specify any distributions.&amp;nbsp; You may want to give serious consideration to switching to PROC MIXED (or GLIMMIX) for the analysis, which will open a richer source of variance-covariance structures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this gets you started in a workable direction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 17:29:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Question-about-estimate-statement-in-GENMOD/m-p/107727#M5707</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-26T17:29:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about estimate statement in GENMOD</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Question-about-estimate-statement-in-GENMOD/m-p/107728#M5708</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Steve!&amp;nbsp; I did as you suggested and abandoned the GEE analysis and used PROC MIXED instead.&amp;nbsp; The lsmestimate statements then worked great.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:17:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Question-about-estimate-statement-in-GENMOD/m-p/107728#M5708</guid>
      <dc:creator>SEP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-01T14:17:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

