<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Constraining the correlation of two random effects in proc MIXED in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Constraining-the-correlation-of-two-random-effects-in-proc-MIXED/m-p/105012#M5550</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know whether this will work, but it is possible to specify the covariance structure as being based on the correlations, using type=unr.&amp;nbsp; From there, it seems possible that you could constrain a correlation to be a fixed value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-11T13:16:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Constraining the correlation of two random effects in proc MIXED</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Constraining-the-correlation-of-two-random-effects-in-proc-MIXED/m-p/105011#M5549</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anybody know how I can constrain the correlation between two random effect to be 1?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know about the PARMS statement (with the hold option), but with this statement I can constrain the Co-variance, but is there a direct way to constrain the correlation itself?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eran.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:00:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Constraining-the-correlation-of-two-random-effects-in-proc-MIXED/m-p/105011#M5549</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-11T13:00:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Constraining the correlation of two random effects in proc MIXED</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Constraining-the-correlation-of-two-random-effects-in-proc-MIXED/m-p/105012#M5550</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know whether this will work, but it is possible to specify the covariance structure as being based on the correlations, using type=unr.&amp;nbsp; From there, it seems possible that you could constrain a correlation to be a fixed value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:16:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Constraining-the-correlation-of-two-random-effects-in-proc-MIXED/m-p/105012#M5550</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-11T13:16:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

