<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic regression on order statistics in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/regression-on-order-statistics/m-p/102918#M5440</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my problem, n bidders place $ bids for unopened lots.&amp;nbsp; They are basing their bids on their judgement of the value of the contents.&amp;nbsp; With bids sorted in order, we have n order statistics, repeated for m lots.&amp;nbsp; I am assuming that a single distribution type generates the bidding, e.g. lognormal or the like. In reality the mean and variance would likely be different for each lot, however to simplify initially I am willing to divide each lot's bids by its high bid.&amp;nbsp; E.g. lot A might have "standardized" order statistics high to low {1, .9, .8, .75, .70. .5,...}.&amp;nbsp; I wish to select a distribution type and its parameters based on these "standardized" sets or order statistics.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PROC UNIVARIATE provides Q-Q plots and methods that readily identify the best distribution and good parameter estimates for each lot.&amp;nbsp; e.g., the Q-Q plot of lot A might be shown to have the best fit to lognormal(.5,1.1)..&amp;nbsp; Of course, if I apply this method to each lot in turn, I get m different results.&amp;nbsp; What I wish is the parameter estimates that are the best fit to data for all lots.&amp;nbsp; Is there a built-in procedure in SAS that does that?&amp;nbsp; or am I on my own to specify a nonlinear regression?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:11:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rs_poetic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-11T17:11:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>regression on order statistics</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/regression-on-order-statistics/m-p/102918#M5440</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my problem, n bidders place $ bids for unopened lots.&amp;nbsp; They are basing their bids on their judgement of the value of the contents.&amp;nbsp; With bids sorted in order, we have n order statistics, repeated for m lots.&amp;nbsp; I am assuming that a single distribution type generates the bidding, e.g. lognormal or the like. In reality the mean and variance would likely be different for each lot, however to simplify initially I am willing to divide each lot's bids by its high bid.&amp;nbsp; E.g. lot A might have "standardized" order statistics high to low {1, .9, .8, .75, .70. .5,...}.&amp;nbsp; I wish to select a distribution type and its parameters based on these "standardized" sets or order statistics.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PROC UNIVARIATE provides Q-Q plots and methods that readily identify the best distribution and good parameter estimates for each lot.&amp;nbsp; e.g., the Q-Q plot of lot A might be shown to have the best fit to lognormal(.5,1.1)..&amp;nbsp; Of course, if I apply this method to each lot in turn, I get m different results.&amp;nbsp; What I wish is the parameter estimates that are the best fit to data for all lots.&amp;nbsp; Is there a built-in procedure in SAS that does that?&amp;nbsp; or am I on my own to specify a nonlinear regression?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:11:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/regression-on-order-statistics/m-p/102918#M5440</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs_poetic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-11T17:11:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: regression on order statistics</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/regression-on-order-statistics/m-p/102919#M5441</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dividing by the maximum bid might not be the best strategy, as extreme value statistics have high variance, especially with long-tailed distributions. I would rather try the transformation &lt;EM&gt;Y&lt;/EM&gt;ij = log(&lt;EM&gt;B&lt;/EM&gt;ij/&lt;EM&gt;B&lt;/EM&gt;mj) where &lt;EM&gt;B&lt;/EM&gt;ij is the bid from bidder &lt;EM&gt;i&lt;/EM&gt; on lot &lt;EM&gt;j&lt;/EM&gt; and &lt;EM&gt;B&lt;/EM&gt;mj is the median bid for lot &lt;EM&gt;j&lt;/EM&gt;. Then I would give it a shot at fitting a single distribution to the whole set of &lt;EM&gt;Y'&lt;/EM&gt;s.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 01:34:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/regression-on-order-statistics/m-p/102919#M5441</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-12T01:34:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: regression on order statistics</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/regression-on-order-statistics/m-p/102920#M5442</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, your approach helps a lot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/regression-on-order-statistics/m-p/102920#M5442</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs_poetic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-13T13:17:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

