<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Clinical analysis: PROC PSMATCH (SAS/STAT or SAS/OR) results differ between SAS 9.4 and Viya in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clinical-analysis-PROC-PSMATCH-SAS-STAT-or-SAS-OR-results-differ/m-p/991990#M49518</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/60547"&gt;@sbxkoenk&lt;/a&gt;, Koen, indeed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How do you manage what is on an acceptable level within a clinical trial analysis? Do you have any experience around it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards, Juan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:07:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JuanS_OCS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-08-11T15:07:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Clinical analysis: PROC PSMATCH (SAS/STAT or SAS/OR) results differ between SAS 9.4 and Viya</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clinical-analysis-PROC-PSMATCH-SAS-STAT-or-SAS-OR-results-differ/m-p/991769#M49516</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are migrating an existing analysis from SAS 9.4 to SAS Viya. The user requirement is that results are reproduced 1-to-1 (clinical analysis).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PS matching procedure does not reproduce exactly:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The estimated propensity scores differ slightly (small numerical differences)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;In several cases the assigned Match ID differs&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;I have attached a small test program. It is not the original code, but it does reproduce the differences.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My questions&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Are others seeing comparable differences in the output of SAS/STAT or SAS/OR procedures when migrating to Viya?&lt;BR /&gt;2. How would you deal with such differences in a migration of clinical analyses to Viya, what do you consider acceptable, and how do you document or justify it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any experience or guidance is very welcome.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Appendix 1:&amp;nbsp;psmatch_test_anon.sas&lt;BR /&gt;Appendix 2: compare between output test code, SAS PC (9.04.01M8, WX64) vs SAS Viya (V.04.00M0,&amp;nbsp;LIN X64)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Stephanvd_2-1785921769313.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/116886i74538846F64184E8/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Stephanvd_2-1785921769313.png" alt="Stephanvd_2-1785921769313.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 09:32:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clinical-analysis-PROC-PSMATCH-SAS-STAT-or-SAS-OR-results-differ/m-p/991769#M49516</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephanvd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-05T09:32:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clinical analysis: PROC PSMATCH (SAS/STAT or SAS/OR) results differ between SAS 9.4 and Viya</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clinical-analysis-PROC-PSMATCH-SAS-STAT-or-SAS-OR-results-differ/m-p/991967#M49517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So you notice very small discrepancies between PSMATCH statistical results in SAS 9.4 on PC (Microsoft) and SAS Viya 4 on a Unix/Linux server.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;These discrepancies - if any - usually stem from hardware-level floating-point arithmetic differences.&amp;nbsp;Or do you have any indication that there’s more to it than that?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;See these links:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://go.documentation.sas.com/doc/en/pgmsascdc/9.4_3.5/lepg/p0dv87zb3bnse6n1mqo360be70qr.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Numeric Precision : SAS Help Center&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://go.documentation.sas.com/doc/en/lrcon/9.4/p0ji1unv6thm0dn1gp4t01a1u0g6.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Numerical Accuracy in SAS Software : SAS Help Center&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings11/275-2011.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;275-2011: Why .1 + .1 Might Not Equal .2 and Other Pitfalls of Floating-Point Arithmetic&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When you compare output datasets with PROC COMPARE,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;try METHOD=relative Criterion=0.000000001; for example&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;or l&lt;SPAN&gt;ook at the fuzz option&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Koen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 21:49:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clinical-analysis-PROC-PSMATCH-SAS-STAT-or-SAS-OR-results-differ/m-p/991967#M49517</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbxkoenk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-10T21:49:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clinical analysis: PROC PSMATCH (SAS/STAT or SAS/OR) results differ between SAS 9.4 and Viya</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clinical-analysis-PROC-PSMATCH-SAS-STAT-or-SAS-OR-results-differ/m-p/991990#M49518</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/60547"&gt;@sbxkoenk&lt;/a&gt;, Koen, indeed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How do you manage what is on an acceptable level within a clinical trial analysis? Do you have any experience around it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards, Juan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 15:07:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clinical-analysis-PROC-PSMATCH-SAS-STAT-or-SAS-OR-results-differ/m-p/991990#M49518</guid>
      <dc:creator>JuanS_OCS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-11T15:07:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Clinical analysis: PROC PSMATCH (SAS/STAT or SAS/OR) results differ between SAS 9.4 and Viya</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clinical-analysis-PROC-PSMATCH-SAS-STAT-or-SAS-OR-results-differ/m-p/992587#M49526</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Juan,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I was seeking to find out whether there are any FDA and/or EMA regulatory guidelines around this topic, but I couldn't find any (maybe my investigation was too&amp;nbsp;superficial !).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I also checked the CAMIS project (&lt;A href="https://psiaims.github.io/CAMIS/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://psiaims.github.io/CAMIS/&lt;/A&gt;) because it deals with discrepancies and conflicting results in (pharma) statistical analyses between different statistical software packages. I was hoping to find some FDA/EMA statements there on how to handle tiny differences, but that's not the case.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR,&lt;BR /&gt;Koen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:35:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Clinical-analysis-PROC-PSMATCH-SAS-STAT-or-SAS-OR-results-differ/m-p/992587#M49526</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbxkoenk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-08-25T11:35:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

